Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2022

Twenty Questions and Answers About the Ozone Layer

Twenty Questions and Answers About the Ozone Layer: 2022 Update


Recommended Citation

The Twenty Questions and Answers About the Ozone Layer: 2022 Update is a component of the Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2022 report. The report is prepared quadrennially by the Scientific Assessment Panel (SAP) of the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. The 2022 edition of the Twenty Questions document is the fifth update of the original edition that appeared in the 2002 Assessment Report. The motivation behind this scientific publication is to tell the story of ozone depletion, ozone-depleting substances and the success of the Montreal Protocol. The questions and answers format divides the narrative into topics that can be read and studied individually by the intended audience of specialists and non-specialists. The topics range from the most basic (e.g., What is ozone?) to more recent developments (e.g., the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol). Each question begins with a short answer followed by a longer, more comprehensive answer. Figures enhance the narrative by illustrating key concepts and results. This document is principally based on scientific results presented in the 2022 and earlier Assessment Reports and has been extensively reviewed by scientists and non-specialists to ensure quality and readability.

We hope that you find this Twenty Questions and Answers edition of value in communicating the scientific basis of ozone depletion and the success of the Montreal Protocol in protecting the ozone layer and climate.

David W. Fahey, Paul A. Newman, John A. Pyle, and Bonfils Safari
Co-Chairs of the Scientific Assessment Panel


Ozone is present only in small amounts in the atmosphere. Nevertheless, ozone is vital to human well-being as well as agricultural and ecosystem sustainability. Most of Earth's ozone resides in the stratosphere, the layer of the atmosphere that is more than 10 kilometers (6 miles) above the surface. About 90% of atmospheric ozone is contained in the stratospheric "ozone layer", which shields Earth's surface from harmful ultraviolet radiation emitted by the Sun.

In the mid-1970s scientists discovered that some human-produced chemicals could lead to depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer. The resulting increase in ultraviolet radiation at Earth's surface would increase incidents of skin cancer and eye cataracts, suppress the immune systems of humans, and also adversely affect agriculture as well as terrestrial and oceanic ecosystems.

Following the discovery of this environmental issue, researchers sought a better understanding of this threat to the ozone layer. Monitoring stations showed that the abundances of gases that are ozone-depleting substances (ODSs), such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), were steadily increasing in the atmosphere. These trends were linked to growing production and use of CFCs and other ODSs for spray can propellants, refrigeration and air conditioning, foam blowing, industrial cleaning, and other applications. Measurements in the laboratory and in the atmosphere characterized the chemical reactions that were involved in ozone destruction. Computer models of the atmosphere employing this information were used to simulate how much ozone depletion was already occurring and to predict how much more might occur in the future.

By the mid-1980s observations of the ozone layer showed that depletion was indeed occurring. The most severe ozone loss, unexpected at the time of discovery, was found to be recurring each springtime over Antarctica. The loss in this region is commonly called the "ozone hole" because the ozone depletion is so large and localized. A thinning of the ozone layer also has been observed over other regions of the globe, such as the Arctic and northern and southern midlatitudes.

The work of many scientists throughout the world has built a broad and solid scientific understanding of the ozone-depletion process. With this foundation, we know that ozone depletion has been occurring and we understand why. Most importantly, we know that if the most potent ODSs were to continue to be emitted and increase in the atmosphere, the result would be ever greater depletion of the ozone layer.

In 1985, the world's governments adopted the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer in response to the prospect of increasing ozone depletion. The Vienna Convention provided a framework through which nations agreed to take appropriate measures to protect human health and the environment from activities that harm the ozone layer, including cooperation on systematic observations, research and exchange of information. In 1987, this framework led to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (the Montreal Protocol), an international treaty designed to control the production and consumption of CFCs and other ODSs. As a result of the broad compliance with the Montreal Protocol and subsequent amendments and adjustments as well as industry's development and deployment of "ozone-friendly" substitutes to replace CFCs, the total global accumulation of ODSs in the atmosphere has begun to decrease.

The replacement of CFCs has occurred in two phases: first via the use of hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) that cause considerably less damage to the ozone layer compared to CFCs, and second by the introduction of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) that do not deplete ozone. In response, global ozone depletion has stabilized, and initial signs of recovery of the ozone layer are being observed. With continued compliance, substantial recovery of the ozone layer is expected by the middle of the 21st century. The day the Montreal Protocol was agreed upon, 16 September, is now celebrated as the International Day for the Preservation of the Ozone Layer. The Montreal Protocol has also decreased the human drivers of global warming, because many CFCs and HFCs are potent greenhouse gases (GHGs).

The amendment and adjustment process is a vitally important aspect of the Montreal Protocol, allowing the protocol to evolve and address emerging issues as our scientific understanding matures. The Protocol was amended or adjusted between 1990 and 2007 at meetings held in London, Copenhagen, Vienna, Beijing, and Montreal (see Q14). The most recent amendment was formulated at the Meeting of the Parties of the Montreal Protocol held in Kigali, Rwanda during October 2016. The Kigali Amendment phases down future global production and consumption of some HFCs to protect future climate, an important new milestone for the Montreal Protocol (see Q19). The Kigali Amendment was motivated by projections of substantial increases in the global use of HFCs in the coming decades. The control of HFCs under this amendment marks the first time the Montreal Protocol has adopted controls solely for the protection of climate.

The protection of the ozone layer and climate under the Montreal Protocol is a story of notable achievements: discovery, understanding, decisions, actions, and verification. It is a success story written by many: scientists, technologists, economists, legal experts, and policymakers, in which continuous dialogue has been a key ingredient. A timeline of milestones related to the science of stratospheric ozone depletion, international scientific assessments, and the Montreal Protocol is illustrated in Figure Q0-1.

To help communicate the broad understanding of the Montreal Protocol, ODSs, and ozone depletion, as well as the relationship of these topics to GHGs and global warming, this component of the Scientfic Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2022 report describes the state of this science with 20 illustrated questions and answers. The questions and answers address the nature of atmospheric ozone, the chemicals that cause ozone depletion, how global and polar ozone depletion occur, the extent of ozone depletion, the success of the Montreal Protocol, the possible future of the ozone layer, and the protection against climate change now provided by the Kigali Amendment. Computer model projections show that GHGs such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) will have a growing influence on global ozone in the coming decades, and in some cases may exceed the influence of ODSs on ozone by the middle of this century, given the expected future decline in the atmospheric abundance of ODSs.

For each question, a brief answer is first given in highlighted text; an expanded answer then follows. The answers are based on the information presented in the 2022 and earlier Assessment reports as well as other international scientific assessments. These reports and the answers provided here were prepared and reviewed by a large number of international scientists who are experts in different research fields related to the science of stratospheric ozone and climate2.

1 Here and throughout, the term ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) refers to gases containing either chlorine or bromine that are released to the atmosphere as a result of human activity and are controlled under Annexes A, B, C, or E of the Montreal Protocol.

2 See Appendix for Acknowledgments.

Ozone in our atmosphere

Ozone is a gas that is naturally present in our atmosphere. Each ozone molecule contains three atoms of oxygen and is denoted chemically as O3. Ozone is found primarily in two regions of the atmosphere. About 10% of Earth's ozone is in the troposphere, which extends from the surface to about 10-15 kilometers (6-9 miles) altitude. About 90% of Earth's ozone resides in the stratosphere, the region of the atmosphere between the top of the troposphere and about 50 kilometers (31 miles) altitude. The part of the stratosphere with the highest amount of ozone is commonly referred to as the "ozone layer". Throughout the atmosphere, ozone is formed in multistep chemical processes that are initiated by sunlight. In the stratosphere, the process begins with an oxygen molecule (O2) being broken apart by ultraviolet radiation from the Sun. In the troposphere, ozone is formed by a different set of chemical reactions that involve naturally occurring gases as well as those from sources of air pollution.

Ozone is a gas that is naturally present in our atmosphere. Ozone has the chemical formula O3 because an ozone molecule contains three oxygen atoms (see Figure Q1-1). Ozone was discovered in laboratory experiments in the mid-1800s. Ozone's presence in the atmosphere was later discovered using chemical and optical measurement methods. The word ozone is derived from the Greek word óζειν (ozein), meaning "to smell." Ozone has a pungent odor that allows it to be detected even at very low amounts. Ozone reacts rapidly with many chemical compounds and is explosive in concentrated amounts. Electrical discharges are generally used to produce ozone for industrial processes such as air and water purification and bleaching of textiles and food products.

Ozone location. Most ozone (about 90%) is found in the stratosphere, which begins about 10-15 kilometers (km) above Earth's surface and extends up to about 50 km altitude. The stratospheric region with the highest concentration of ozone, between about 15 and 35 km altitude, is commonly known as the "ozone layer" (see Figure Q1-2). The stratospheric ozone layer extends over the entire globe, with some variation in its altitude and thickness. Most of the remaining ozone (about 10%) is found in the troposphere, which is the lowest region of the atmosphere, between Earth's surface and the stratosphere. Tropospheric air is the "air we breathe" and, as such, excess ozone in the troposphere has harmful consequence (see Q2).

Ozone abundance. Ozone molecules constitute a small fraction of the gas molecules in the atmosphere. Most air molecules are either oxygen (O2) or nitrogen (N2). In the stratosphere, near the peak concentration of the ozone layer, there are typically a few thousand ozone molecules for every billion air molecules (1 billion = 1,000 million). In the troposphere near Earth's surface, ozone is even less abundant, with a typical range of 20 to 100 ozone molecules for each billion air molecules. The highest ozone values near the surface occur in air that is polluted by human activities. Throughout this document the word “abundance” refers to the concentration or amount of an atmospheric gas or some other physical quantity.

As an illustration of the low relative abundance of ozone in our atmosphere, one can imagine bringing all the ozone molecules in the troposphere and stratosphere down to Earth's surface and forming a layer of pure ozone that extends over the entire globe. The resulting layer would have an average thickness of about three millimeters (0.12 inches), which scientists would report as 300 Dobson Units (see Q3). Nonetheless, this extremely small fraction of the atmosphere plays a vital role in protecting life on Earth (see Q2).

Stratospheric ozone. Stratospheric ozone is formed naturally by chemical reactions involving solar ultraviolet radiation (sunlight) and oxygen molecules, which make up about 21% of the atmosphere. In the first step, solar ultraviolet radiation breaks apart one oxygen molecule (O2) to produce two oxygen atoms (2 O) (see Figure Q1-3). In the second step, each of these highly reactive oxygen atoms combines with an oxygen molecule to produce an ozone molecule (O3). These reactions occur continually whenever solar ultraviolet radiation is present in the stratosphere. As a result, the largest ozone production occurs in the tropical stratosphere.

The production of stratospheric ozone is balanced by its destruction in chemical reactions. Ozone reacts continually with sunlight and a wide variety of natural and human-produced chemicals in the stratosphere. In each reaction, an ozone molecule is lost and other chemical compounds are produced. Important reactive gases that destroy ozone are hydrogen and nitrogen oxides and those containing chlorine and bromine (see Q7). Some stratospheric ozone is regularly transported down into the troposphere and can occasionally influence ozone amounts at Earth's surface.

Tropospheric ozone. Near Earth's surface, ozone is produced by chemical reactions involving gases emitted into the atmosphere from both natural sources and human activities. Ozone production in the troposphere primarily occurs by reactions of hydrocarbon and nitrogen oxide gases, and all require sunlight for completion. Fossil fuel combustion and deforestation are the primary sources of pollutant gases that lead to production of tropospheric ozone. As in the stratosphere, ozone in the troposphere is destroyed by naturally occurring chemical reactions and by reactions involving human-produced chemicals. Tropospheric ozone can also be destroyed when ozone reacts with a variety of surfaces, such as those of soils and plants.

Balance of chemical processes. Ozone abundances in the stratosphere and troposphere are determined by the balance between chemical processes that produce and destroy ozone. The balance is determined by the amounts of reactive gases and how the rate or effectiveness of the various reactions varies with sunlight intensity, location in the atmosphere, temperature, and other factors. As atmospheric conditions change to favor ozone-producing reactions in a certain location, ozone abundances increase. Similarly, if conditions change to favor other reactions that destroy ozone, abundances decrease. The balance of production and loss reactions, combined with atmospheric air motions that transport and mix air with different ozone abundances, determines the global distribution of ozone on timescales of days to many months (see also Q3). Global stratospheric ozone decreased from the 1970s to the late 1990s (see Q12 and Q13) because the amounts of reactive gases containing chlorine and bromine in the stratosphere increased due to human activities (see Q6 and Q15).

Ozone in the stratosphere absorbs a large part of the Sun's biologically harmful ultraviolet radiation. Stratospheric ozone is considered "good" ozone because of this beneficial role. In contrast, ozone formed at Earth's surface in excess of natural amounts is considered “bad” ozone because this gas is harmful to humans, plants, and animals.

Ozone in the stratosphere (Good ozone). Stratospheric ozone is considered good for humans and other life forms because ozone absorbs ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the Sun (see Figure Q2-1). The Sun emits UV radiation that scientists categorize into three wavelength ranges: UV-C (100 to 280 nanometer (nm) wavelengths); UV-B (280 to 315 nm), and UV-A (315 to 400 nm). The energy of solar UV radiation, which cannot be seen by the human eye, is higher at shorter wavelengths. Exposure to high energy UV-C radiation is particularly dangerous to all life forms. Fortunately, UV-C radiation is entirely absorbed within the ozone layer. Most UV-B radiation emitted by the Sun is absorbed by the ozone layer; the rest reaches Earth's surface. In humans, increased exposure to UV-B radiation raises the risks of skin cancer and cataracts, and suppresses the immune system. Exposure to UV-B radiation before adulthood and cumulative exposure are both important health risk factors. Excessive UV-B exposure also can damage terrestrial plant life, including agricultural crops, single-celled organisms, and aquatic ecosystems. Low energy UV radiation, UV-A, which is not absorbed significantly by the ozone layer, causes premature aging of the skin.

Protecting stratospheric ozone. In the mid-1970s, it was discovered that gases containing chlorine and bromine atoms released by human activities could cause stratospheric ozone depletion (see Q5 and Q6). These gases, referred to as halogen source gases, and also as ozone-depleting substances (ODSs), chemically release their chlorine and bromine atoms after they reach the stratosphere. Ozone depletion increases surface UV-B radiation above naturally occurring amounts. International efforts have been successful in protecting the ozone layer through controls on the production and consumption of ODSs (see Q14 and Q15).

Ozone in the troposphere (Bad ozone). Ozone near Earth's surface in excess of natural amounts is considered bad ozone (see Figure Q1-2). Surface ozone in excess of natural levels is formed by reactions involving air pollutants emitted from human activities, such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and various hydrocarbons (gases containing hydrogen, carbon, and often oxygen). Exposure to ozone at concentrations above natural levels is harmful to humans, plants, and other living systems because ozone reacts strongly to destroy or alter molecules that constitute biological tissue. Enhanced surface ozone caused by air pollution reduces crop yields and forest growth. In humans, exposure to high levels of ozone can reduce lung capacity; cause chest pains, throat irritation, and coughing; and worsen pre-existing health conditions related to the heart and lungs. In addition, increases in tropospheric ozone lead to a warming of Earth's surface because ozone is a greenhouse gas (GHG) (see Q17). The negative effects of excess tropospheric ozone contrast sharply with the protection from harmful UV radiation afforded by preserving the natural abundance of stratospheric ozone.

Reducing tropospheric ozone. Limiting the emission of certain common pollutants reduces the production of excess ozone near Earth's surface, where ozone can affect humans, plants, and animals. Major sources of pollutants include large cities, where fossil fuel consumption for transportation, heating, and industrial activities is concentrated, power plants that rely on coal, oil, or natural gas, as well as deforestation, wildfires, and the burning of savannah for agriculture. Many programs around the globe have been successful in reducing or limiting the emission of pollutants that cause production of excess ozone near Earth's surface.

Natural ozone. In the absence of human activities, ozone would still be present near Earth's surface and throughout the troposphere and stratosphere because ozone is a natural component of the clean atmosphere. Natural emissions from the biosphere, mainly from trees, participate in chemical reactions that produce ozone. Atmospheric ozone plays important ecological roles beyond absorbing UV radiation. For example, ozone initiates the chemical removal of many pollutants as well as some GHGs, such as methane (CH4). In addition, the absorption by ozone of solar UV radiation as well as visible and infrared radiation is a natural source of heat in the stratosphere, causing temperatures to increase with altitude. Stratospheric temperatures affect the balance of ozone production and destruction processes (see Q1) and air motions that redistribute ozone throughout the stratosphere (see Q3).

The distribution of total ozone over Earth varies with geographic location and on daily and seasonal time-scales. These variations are caused by large-scale movements of stratospheric and tropospheric air and the chemical production and destruction of ozone. Total ozone is generally lowest at the equator and highest in midlatitude and polar regions.

Total ozone. The total column of ozone at any location on the globe is defined as the sum of all the ozone in the atmosphere directly above that location. Most ozone resides in the stratospheric ozone layer and a small percentage (about 5 to 10%) is distributed throughout the troposphere (see Q1). Total column ozone values are usually reported in Dobson units denoted as "DU." Typical values vary between 200 and 500 DU over the globe, with a global average abundance of about 300 DU (see Figure Q3-1). The ozone molecules required for total ozone to be 300 DU would form a layer of pure ozone gas at Earth's surface having a thickness of only 3 millimeters (0.12 inches) (see Q1), which is about the height of a stack of 2 common coins, if these molecules could be isolated and compressed. It is remarkable that a layer of pure ozone only 3 millimeters thick protects life on Earth's surface from most of the harmful UV radiation emitted by the Sun (see Q2).

Global distribution. Total ozone varies strongly with latitude over the globe, with the largest values occurring at middle and high latitudes during most of the year (see Figure Q3-1). This distribution is the result of the large-scale circulation of air in the stratosphere that slowly transports ozone-rich air from high altitudes in the tropics, where ozone production from solar ultraviolet radiation is largest, toward the poles. Ozone accumulates at middle and high latitudes, increasing the vertical extent of the ozone layer and, at the same time, total ozone. The total column of ozone is generally smallest in the tropics for all seasons. An exception since the mid-1980s is the region of low values of ozone over Antarctica during spring in the Southern Hemisphere, a phenomenon known as the Antarctic ozone hole (dark blue, Figure Q3-1; also see Q10 and Q11).

Seasonal distribution. Total ozone also varies with season, as shown in Figure Q3-1 using two-week averages of ozone taken from satellite observations acquired in 2021. March and September plots represent the early spring and autumn seasons in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, respectively. June and December plots similarly represent the early summer and winter seasons. During spring, total ozone exhibits maximums at latitudes poleward of about 45° N in the Northern Hemisphere and between 45° and 60° S in the Southern Hemisphere. These spring maximums are a result of increased transport of ozone from its source region in the tropics toward high latitudes during late autumn and winter. This poleward ozone transport is much weaker during the summer and early autumn periods and is weaker overall in the Southern Hemisphere.

This natural seasonal cycle can be observed clearly in the Northern Hemisphere as shown in Figure Q3-1, with increasing values in Arctic total ozone during winter, a clear maximum in spring, and decreasing values from summer to autumn. In the Antarctic, however, a pronounced minimum in total ozone is observed during spring. The minimum is known as the "ozone hole", which is caused by the widespread chemical depletion of ozone in spring by pollutants known as ozone-depleting substances (see Q5 and Q10). In the late 1970s, before the ozone hole appeared each year, much higher ozone values than those currently observed were found in the Antarctic spring (see Q10). Currently, the lowest values of total ozone across the globe and all seasons are found during early spring in the Antarctic, as shown in Figure Q3-1. After spring, these low values disappear from total ozone maps as polar air mixes with lower-latitude air containing much higher amounts of ozone.

In the tropics, the change in total ozone through the progression of the seasons is much smaller than at higher latitudes. This feature is present because seasonal changes in both sunlight and ozone transport are much smaller in the tropics compared to higher latitudes.

The abundance of ozone is larger at midlatitudes in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) than the Southern Hemisphere (SH), for all four seasons in the respective hemispheres. The thinner ozone layer at SH midlatitudes compared to NH midlatitudes is due to several factors: differences in the large-scale circulation of the two hemispheres that preceded the development of the ozone hole as well as larger abundances of tropospheric ozone in the NH compared to the SH that is caused by more pollution in the more heavily populated NH. Dilution of ozone-depleted air from the Antarctic ozone hole region starting in the 1980s further increases the hemispheric difference in total ozone. This hemispheric total ozone difference results in higher levels of UV light reaching the surface in the SH compared to the NH (see Q16).

Natural variations. Total ozone varies strongly with latitude and longitude, as seen within the seasonal plots in Figure Q3-1. These patterns come about for two reasons. First, atmospheric winds transport air between regions of the stratosphere that have high ozone values and those that have low ozone values. Tropospheric weather systems can temporarily alter the vertical extent of the ozone layer in a region, and thereby change total ozone. The regular nature of these air motions, in some cases associated with geographical features (oceans and mountains), in turn causes recurring patterns in the distribution of total ozone. Second, ozone variations occur as a result of changes in the balance of chemical production and loss processes. This balance is very sensitive to the amount of solar UV radiation (see Q2) reaching the various parts of the atmosphere.

There is a good understanding of how chemistry and air motions work together to cause the observed large-scale features in total ozone, such as those seen in Figure Q3-1. Ozone changes are routinely monitored by a large group of scientists using satellite, airborne, and ground-based instruments. The continued analyses of these observations provide an important long-term basis to quantify the contribution of human activities to ozone depletion.

The amount of ozone in the atmosphere is measured by instruments on the ground and carried aloft on balloons, aircraft, and satellites. Some instruments measure ozone remotely over long distances by using ozone's unique optical absorption or emission properties. Other instruments measure ozone locally by continuously drawing air samples into a small detection chamber.

The abundance of ozone in the atmosphere is measured by a variety of techniques (see Figure Q4-1). The techniques make use of ozone's unique optical and chemical properties. There are two principal categories of measurement techniques: local and remote. Ozone measurements by these techniques have been essential in monitoring changes in the ozone layer and in developing our understanding of the processes that control ozone abundances.

Local measurements. Local measurements of the atmospheric abundance of ozone are those that require air to be drawn directly into an instrument. Once inside an instrument's detection chamber, the amount of ozone is determined by measuring the absorption of ultraviolet (UV) radiation or by the electrical current or light produced in a chemical reaction involving ozone. The latter approach is used in "ozonesondes", which are lightweight, ozone-measuring modules suitable for launching on small balloons. The balloons ascend up to altitudes of about 32 to 35 kilometers (km), high enough to measure ozone in the stratospheric ozone layer. Ozonesondes are launched regularly at many locations around the world. Local ozone-measuring instruments using optical or chemical detection schemes are also used on research aircraft to measure the distribution of ozone in the troposphere and lower stratosphere (up to altitudes of about 20 km). High-altitude research aircraft can reach the ozone layer at most locations over the globe and can reach furthest into the layer at high latitudes. Ozone measurements are also being made routinely on some commercial aircraft flights. Local measurements of the abundance of ozone at the surface are obtained at many thousands of sites over the globe, which provide hourly data critical for assessing and improving air quality throughout the world.

Remote measurements. Remote measurements of total ozone amounts and the altitude distributions of ozone are obtained by detecting ozone at large distances from the instrument. Most remote measurements of ozone rely on its unique absorption of UV radiation. Sources of UV radiation that can be used are sunlight (and reflected sunlight from the moon), lasers, and starlight. For example, satellite instruments use the absorption of solar UV radiation by the atmosphere or the absorption of sunlight scattered from the surface of Earth to measure ozone over nearly the entire globe on a daily basis. Lidar instruments, which measure backscattered laser light, are routinely deployed at ground sites and on research aircraft to detect ozone over a distance of many kilometers along the laser light path. A network of ground-based instruments measures ozone by detecting small changes in the amount of the Sun's UV radiation that reaches Earth's surface. Other instruments measure ozone using either its absorption of infrared, visible, or ultraviolet radiation or its emission of microwave or infrared radiation at different altitudes in the atmosphere, thereby obtaining information on the vertical distribution of ozone. Emission measurements have the advantage of providing remote ozone measurements at night, which is particularly valuable for sampling polar regions during winter, when there is continuous darkness.

The ozone depletion process

The initial step in the depletion of stratospheric ozone by human activities is the emission, at Earth's surface, of gases that contain chlorine and bromine and have long atmospheric lifetimes. Most of these gases accumulate in the lower atmosphere because they are relatively unreactive and do not dissolve readily in rain or snow. Natural air motions eventually transport these accumulated gases to the stratosphere, where they are converted to more reactive gases. Some of these gases then participate in reactions that destroy ozone. Finally, when stratospheric large-scale circulation patterns return this air to the lower atmosphere, these reactive chlorine and bromine gases are removed from Earth's atmosphere by rain and snow.

The principal steps in stratospheric ozone depletion caused by human activities are shown in Figure Q5-1.

Emission, accumulation, and transport. The process begins with the emission, at Earth's surface, of long-lived source gases containing the halogens chlorine and bromine (Q6). The halogen source gases, often referred to as ozone-depleting substances (ODSs), include manufactured chemicals released to the atmosphere when used in a variety of applications, such as refrigeration, air conditioning, and foam blowing. Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are an important example of chlorine-containing source gases. Emitted source gases accumulate in the lower atmosphere (troposphere) and are slowly transported to the stratosphere by natural air motions. The accumulation occurs because most source gases are highly unreactive in the lower atmosphere. Furthermore, only a small amount of halogen source gases dissolve in ocean waters. The low reactivity of these manufactured halogenated gases within the lower atmosphere is one property that made them well suited for specialized applications such as refrigeration.

Some halogen gases are emitted in substantial quantities from natural sources (see Q6). These emissions also accumulate in the troposphere, are transported to the stratosphere, and participate in ozone destruction reactions. These naturally emitted gases are part of the natural balance of ozone production and destruction that predates the large release of manufactured halogenated gases and the associated observed ozone depletion.

Conversion, reaction, and removal. Halogen source gases do not react directly with ozone. Once in the stratosphere, halogen source gases are chemically converted to reactive and reservoir halogen gases by the absorption of ultraviolet radiation from the Sun (see Q7). The rate of conversion is related to the atmospheric lifetime of a gas (see Q6). Gases with longer lifetimes have slower conversion rates and survive longer in the atmosphere after emission. Lifetimes of the principal ODSs vary from about 1 to 100 years (see Table Q6-1). Emitted gas molecules with atmospheric lifetimes greater than a few decades circulate between the troposphere and stratosphere multiple times, on average, before conversion occurs.

The reactive gases formed from halogen source gases react chemically to destroy ozone in the stratosphere (see Q8). The average depletion of total ozone attributed to reactive gases is smallest in the tropics and largest at high latitudes (see Q12). In polar regions, reactions that occur on the surface of polar stratospheric clouds, which exist only at low temperatures, greatly increase the abundance of the most important reactive chlorine gas, chlorine monoxide (ClO) (see Q9). his process results in substantial ozone destruction in polar regions in late winter/early spring (see Q10 and Q11).

Air in the stratosphere is generally isolated from the troposphere. A small portion of stratospheric air returns to the troposphere every day, bringing along reactive and reservoir halogen gases. On average, it takes several years for air throughout the global stratosphere to return to the troposphere. Reactive halogen gases that are transported back to the troposphere are removed from the atmosphere by rain and other precipitation or deposited by wind onto Earth's land or ocean surfaces. These removal processes bring to an end the destruction of ozone by chlorine and bromine atoms that were first released to the atmosphere as components of halogen source gas molecules.

Tropospheric conversion. Halogen source gases with short lifetimes (less than 1 year) undergo significant chemical conversion in the troposphere, producing reactive and reservoir halogen gases. Source gas molecules that are not converted are transported to the stratosphere. Only small portions of reactive and reservoir halogen gases produced in the troposphere are transported to the stratosphere, because most are removed by precipitation. Important examples of halogen gases that undergo some tropospheric removal, prior to transport to the stratosphere, are the hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), methyl bromide (CH3Br), methyl chloride (CH3Cl), and gases containing iodine (see Q6).

Certain industrial processes and consumer products result in the emission of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) to the atmosphere. Principal ODSs are manufactured halogen source gases that are now controlled worldwide by the Montreal Protocol. These gases bring chlorine and bromine atoms to the stratosphere, where they destroy ozone in chemical reactions. Important examples are the chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), once used in almost all refrigeration and air conditioning systems, and the halons, which were used as fire extinguishing agents. Current ODS abundances in the atmosphere are known directly from air sample measurements.

Halogen source gases versus ozone-depleting substances (ODSs). Halogen source gases that are emitted by human activities and controlled by the Montreal Protocol are generally referred to as ODSs. The Montreal Protocol controls the global production and consumption of ODSs (see Q14). Halogen source gases such as methyl chloride (CH3Cl) that have predominantly natural sources are not classified as ODSs. The contributions of various ODSs and natural halogen source gases to the total amount of chlorine and bromine entering the stratosphere are shown in Figure Q6-1. Total chlorine and total bromine entering the stratosphere peaked in 1993 and 1999, respectively. The difference in the timing of these peaks is a result of various phaseout schedules specified by the Montreal Protocol and its amendments and adjustments, different atmospheric lifetimes of halogen source gases, and the time delays between production and emission of the numerous source gases. Also shown are the contributions to total chlorine and bromine in 2020, highlighting the reductions of 11% and 15%, respectively, achieved by the controls of the Montreal Protocol.

Ozone-depleting substances (ODSs). The principal ODSs are manufactured for specific industrial uses or consumer products, most of which result in the eventual emission of these gases to the atmosphere. Total ODS emissions increased substantially from the middle to the late 20th century, reached a peak in the late 1980s, and are now in decline (see Figure Q0-1). Because of their long atmospheric lifetimes, a large fraction of the emitted ODSs reach the stratosphere, where they are converted to reactive and reservoir gases containing chlorine and bromine that lead to ozone depletion.

ODSs containing only carbon, chlorine, and fluorine are called chlorofluorocarbons, usually abbreviated as CFCs. The principal CFCs are CFC-11 (CCl3F), CFC-12 (CCl2F2), and CFC-113 (CCl2FCClF2). CFCs, along with carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) and methyl chloroform (CH3CCl3), historically have been the most important chlorine-containing halogen source gases emitted by human activities. These and other chlorine-containing ODSs have been used in many applications, including refrigeration, air conditioning, foam blowing, spray can propellants, and cleaning of metals and electronic components. As a result of the Montreal Protocol controls, the abundances of these chlorine source gases have decreased since 1993 (see Figure Q6-1). The concentrations of CFC-11 and CFC-12 peaked in 1994 and 2002, respectively, and have since decreased (see Figure Q15-1). The abundances of CFC-11 and CFC-12 in 2020 were 16% and 2.8% lower than their values in 1993, respectively.

The class of compounds known as hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) contain hydrogen, in addition to chlorine, fluorine, and carbon. HCFC-22 (CHF2Cl), developed in the 1930s, has been used as a refrigerant, primarily in residential air conditioners, since the 1940s. As detailed below, HCFCs are less harmful to the ozone layer compared to CFCs. In the 1990s, the use of HCFC-22 expanded and other HCFCs were developed as substitutes for CFCs. Consequently, the chlorine content of HCFCs entering the stratosphere increased by 185% between 1993 and 2020 (see Figure Q6-1). With restrictions on production starting in 1996, and globally in place since 2013, the atmospheric abundances of HCFCs are expected to peak between 2023 and 2030 (see Figures Q0-1 and Q15-1). Classes of compounds known as hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs) constitute the replacement for many applications of HCFCs.

Another category of ODSs contains bromine. The most important of these gases are the halons and methyl bromide (CH3Br). Halons are a group of industrial compounds that contain at least one bromine and one carbon atom; halons may or may not contain a chlorine atom. Halons were originally developed to extinguish fires and were widely used to protect large computer installations, military hardware, and commercial aircraft engines. Consequently, halons are often released directly into the atmosphere upon use or testing of these fire suppression systems. The most abundant halons emitted by human activities are halon-1211 (CBrClF2) and halon-1301 (CBrF3). Methyl bromide is used primarily as a fumigant for pest control in agriculture and disinfection of export shipping goods, and also has significant natural sources.

As a result of the controls of the Montreal Protocol, the contribution to the atmospheric abundance of methyl bromide from human activities decreased by 71% between 1999 and 2020 (see Figure Q6-1). The concentration of halon-1211 peaked in 2005 and has been decreasing ever since, reaching an abundance in 2020 that was 22% below that measured in 1999. The abundance of halon-1301, on the other hand, increased by 19% since 1999 and is expected to slowly decline into the next decade because of continued small releases and a long atmospheric lifetime (see Figure Q15-1). In 2020, the bromine content of other halons (mainly halon-1202 and halon-2402) was 25% below the amount present in 1999.

Natural sources of chlorine and bromine. There are a few halogen source gases present in the stratosphere that have large natural sources. These include methyl chloride (CH3Cl) and methyl bromide (CH3Br), both of which are emitted by oceanic and terrestrial ecosystems. In addition, very short-lived source gases (defined as compounds with atmospheric lifetimes typically less than 0.5 year) containing bromine such as bromoform (CHBr3) and dibromomethane (CH2Br2) are also released to the atmosphere, primarily from biological activity in the oceans. Only a fraction of the emissions of very short-lived source gases reaches the stratosphere because these gases are efficiently removed in the lower atmosphere. Volcanoes provide an episodic source of reactive halogen gases that sometimes reach the stratosphere in appreciable quantities.

Other natural sources of halogens include reactive chlorine and bromine produced by evaporation of ocean spray. However, these reactive chemicals play no role in stratospheric ozone depletion because they readily dissolve in water and are removed in the troposphere.

In 2020, natural sources contributed about 17% of total stratospheric chlorine and about 56% of total stratospheric bromine (see Figure Q6-1). The amount of chlorine and bromine entering the stratosphere from natural sources is known to be fairly constant over time and, therefore, cannot be the cause of the ozone depletion observed since the 1980s.

Other human activities that are sources of chlorine and bromine gases. Other chlorine- and bromine-containing gases are released to the atmosphere from human activities. Common examples are the use of chlorine-containing solvents and industrial chemicals, and the use of chlorine gases in paper production and disinfection of potable and industrial water supplies (including swimming pools). Most of these gases are very short-lived and only a small fraction of their emissions reaches the stratosphere. The contribution of very short-lived chlorinated gases from natural sources and human activities to total stratospheric chlorine was 63% larger in 2020 than in 1993, and now contributes about 4% (130 ppt) of the total chlorine entering the stratosphere (see Figure Q6-1). The Montreal Protocol does not control the production and consumption of very short-lived chlorine source gases, although the atmospheric abundances of some (notably dichloromethane, CH2Cl2) have increased substantially in recent years. Solid rocket engines, such as those used to propel payloads into orbit, release reactive chlorine gases directly into the troposphere and stratosphere. The quantities of chlorine emitted globally by rockets is currently small in comparison with halogen emissions from other human activities.

Lifetimes and emissions. Estimates of global emissions in 2020 for a selected set of halogen source gases are given in Table Q6-1. These emissions occur from continued production of HCFCs and HFCs as well as the release of gases from banks. Emission from banks refers to the atmospheric release of halocarbons from existing equipment, chemical stockpiles, foams, and other products. In 2020 the global emission of the refrigerant HCFC-22 constituted the largest annual release, by mass, of a halocarbon from human activities. Release in 2020 of HFC-134a (CH2FCF3), another refrigerant, was second largest. The emission of methyl chloride (CH3Cl) is primarily from natural sources such as the ocean biosphere, terrestrial plants, salt marshes and fungi. The human source of methyl chloride is small relative to the total natural source (see Q15).

After emission, halogen source gases are either removed from the atmosphere or undergo chemical conversion in the troposphere, stratosphere, or mesosphere. The time to remove or convert about 63% of a gas is often called its atmospheric lifetime. Lifetimes vary from less than 1 year to 100 years for the principal chlorine- and bromine-containing gases (see Table Q6-1). The long-lived gases are converted to other gases primarily in the stratosphere and essentially all of their original halogen content becomes available to participate in the destruction of stratospheric ozone. Conversely, gases with short lifetimes such as methyl bromide, methyl chloride, and some HCFCs are converted to other gases in the troposphere, which are then removed from the atmosphere by rain and snow. Therefore, only a fraction of their halogen content contributes to ozone depletion in the stratosphere. Methyl chloride, despite its large source, constituted only about 17% (540 ppt) of the halogen source gases entering the stratosphere in 2020 (see Figure Q6-1).

The amount of an emitted gas that is present in the atmosphere represents a balance between its emission and removal rates. A wide range of current emission rates and atmospheric lifetimes are derived for the various source gases (see Table Q6-1). The atmospheric abundances of most of the principal CFCs and halons have decreased since 1990 in response to smaller emission rates, while those of the important substitute gases, the HCFCs, continue to slowly increase under the provisions of the Montreal Protocol (see Q15). In the past few years, the rate of the increase of the atmospheric abundance of HCFCs has declined. In the coming decades, the emissions and atmospheric abundances of all controlled ODSs are expected to decrease under these provisions.

Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP). The effectiveness of halogen source gases at destroying stratospheric ozone is given by the ODP (see Table Q6-1 and Q17). A gas with a larger ODP destroys more stratospheric ozone than a gas with a smaller ODP. The calculation of ODP requires the use of computer models that simulate atmospheric ozone and is found relative to CFC-11, which has an ODP defined to be 1. The ODP of a gas is based upon a comparison of the amount of ozone depletion caused by the continuous emission to the atmosphere of a certain mass of that gas, relative to the amount of ozone depletion following emission of the same mass of CFC-11. Halogen source gases controlled by the Montreal Protocol have a wide range of ODPs. Halon-1211 and halon-1301 have ODPs significantly larger than that of CFC-11 and most other chlorinated gases because bromine is much more effective (about 60 times) on a per-atom basis than chlorine in chemical reactions that destroy ozone. The gases with smaller values of ODP generally have shorter atmospheric lifetimes or contain fewer chlorine and bromine atoms compared to gases with larger ODPs.

HFCs & other fluorine-containing gases. Many of the source gases in Figure Q6-1 also contain fluorine, another halogen, in addition to chlorine or bromine. After the source gases undergo conversion in the stratosphere (see Q5), the fluorine content of these gases is left in chemical forms that do not cause ozone depletion. As a consequence, halogen source gases that contain fluorine and no other halogens are not classified as ODSs. An important example of these are the HFCs, which are included in Table Q6-1 because they are common ODS substitute gases. HFCs do not contain chlorine or bromine and, consequently, all HFCs have an ODP of zero.

Many HFCs are strong greenhouse gases, as quantified by a metric termed the Global Warming Potential (GWP) (see Q17). The Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol now controls the production and consumption of HFCs (see Q19), especially those HFCs with high GWPs. As a result, industry has transitioned in part to production and use of a subset of HFCs with very low GWPs known as hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs), which are also composed of hydrogen, fluorine, and carbon atoms. Here, the "O" stands for olefin, a term used by chemists to refer to the double carbon bond of these compounds that results in small tropospheric lifetimes and GWPs for HFOs. One such HFO, HFO-1234yf (CF3CFCH2), has a GWP of less than 1 due to its 12 day lifetime.

Iodine containing gases. Iodine is a component of several gases that are naturally emitted from the oceans and from some human activities. Research on the importance of iodine for stratospheric ozone is being conducted, in part, because trifluoroiodomethane (CF3I) is a possible replacement for halons in fire extinguishers and also because CF3I has been proposed as an ingredient of low-GWP refrigerant blends. Although iodine can participate in ozone destruction reactions, iodine-containing source gases all have very short lifetimes, with most of the removal occurring in the lower atmosphere within a few days. Since the last assessment, there has been an upward revision to the upper limit on the amount of iodine reaching the stratosphere, which is now estimated to be about 1 ppt. The importance for stratospheric ozone of very short-lived iodine containing source gases, including a possible enhancement of polar ozone depletion, remains an active area of investigation.

Other non-halogen gases. Other non-halogen gases that influence stratospheric ozone abundances have also increased in the stratosphere as a result of emissions from human activities (see Q20). Important examples are methane (CH4), which reacts in the stratosphere to form water vapor and reactive hydrogen, and nitrous oxide (N2O), which reacts in the stratosphere to form nitrogen oxides. These reactive products participate in the destruction of stratospheric ozone. Increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) alter stratospheric temperature and winds, which also affect the abundance of stratospheric ozone. Should future atmospheric abundances of CO2, CH4 and N2O increase significantly relative to present-day values, these increases will affect future levels of stratospheric ozone through combined effects on temperature, winds, and chemistry (see Figure Q20-2). Efforts are underway to reduce the emissions of these gases under the Paris Agreement of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change because they cause surface warming (see Q18 and Q19). Although past emissions of ODSs still dominate global ozone depletion today, future emissions of N2O from human activities are expected to become relatively more important for ozone depletion as the atmospheric abundances of ODSs decline (see Q20).

Table Q6-1. Atmospheric lifetimes, global emissions, Ozone Depletion Potentials, and Global Warming Potentials of some halogen source gases and HFC substitute gases.

GasAtmospheric Lifetime (years)Global Emissions in 2020 (kt/yr)aOzone Depletion Potential (ODP)bGlobal Warming Potential (GWP)b
Halogen Source Gases
Chlorine Gases
CFC-11 (CCl3F)5236 - 5816410
Carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)3027 - 600.872150
CFC-113 (CCl2FCClF2)931 - 130.826530
CFC-12 (CCl2F2)1023 - 480.7512,500
Methyl chloroform (CH3CCl3)5.01 - 30.12164
HCFC-141b (CH3CCl2F)8.848 - 670.102808
HCFC-142b (CH3CClF2)1715 - 230.0572190
HCFC-22 (CHF2Cl)12284 - 4030.0381910
Methyl chloride (CH3Cl)0.93759 - 56770.0156
Bromine Gases
Halon-1301 (CBrF3)721 - 2177430
Halon-1211 (CBrClF2)161 - 57.11990
Methyl bromide (CH3Br)0.8115 - 1540.572
Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
HFC-23 (CHF3)22816 - 18014,700
HFC-143a (CH3CF3)5227 - 3305900
HFC-125 (CHF2CF3)3178 - 9803820
HFC-134a (CH2FCF3)14216 - 27501470
HFC-32 (CH2F2)5.356 - 770749
HFC-152a (CH3CHF2)1.541 - 630153
HFO-1234yf (CF3CF=CH2)0.03not available0less than 1

a Includes both human activities (production and banks) and natural sources. Emissions are in units of kilotonnes per year (1 kilotonne = 1000 metric tons = 1 gigagram = 109 grams). These emission estimates are based on analysis of atmospheric observations. The range of values for each emission estimate reflects the uncertainty in estimating emissions from atmospheric observations.

b 100-year GWP. ODPs and GWPs are discussed in Q17. Values are calculated for emissions of an equal mass of each gas. ODPs given here reflect current scientific values and in some cases differ from those used in the Montreal Protocol.

Chlorine and bromine containing halogen source gases that enter the stratosphere arise from both human activities and natural processes (Q6). When exposed to ultraviolet radiation from the Sun, these halogen source gases are converted to other gases that also contain chlorine and bromine. Some of the gases act as chemical reservoirs, which can then be converted into ClO and BrO, the two most important reactive gases that participate in catalytic reactions that destroy ozone.

Halogen-containing gases present in the stratosphere can be divided into two groups: halogen source gases as well as reactive and reservoir halogen gases (see Figure Q7-1). The source gases, which include ozone-depleting substances (ODSs), are emitted at Earth's surface by natural processes and by human activities (see Q6) and are chemically inert in the lower atmosphere. Once in the stratosphere, the halogen source gases chemically convert at different rates to form the reactive and reservoir halogen gases. The conversion occurs in the stratosphere instead of the troposphere because solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation (a component of sunlight) is needed for the breakup of these compounds, and solar UV radiation is more intense in the stratosphere than the troposphere (see Q2).Reactive gases containing the halogens chlorine and bromine participate in a series of chemical reactions that remove stratospheric ozone (see Q8).

Reactive and reservoir halogen gases. The chemical conversion of halogen source gases, which involves solar ultraviolet radiation and other chemical reactions, produces a number of reactive and reservoir halogen gases. These reactive and reservoir gases contain all of the chlorine and bromine atoms originally present in the source gases. The chlorine content of all of the reactive and reservoir gases is termed available chlorine, while the bromine content of similar gases is termed available bromine.

The most important reactive and reservoir chlorine and bromine containing gases that form in the stratosphere are shown in Figure Q7-1. Throughout the stratosphere, the most abundant are typically hydrogen chloride (HCl) and chlorine nitrate (ClONO2). These two gases are considered reservoir gases because, while they do not react directly with ozone, they can be converted to the most reactive forms that do chemically destroy ozone. The halogens most reactive with ozone are chlorine monoxide (ClO) and bromine monoxide (BrO) molecules, as well as chlorine and bromine (Cl and Br) atoms. A large fraction of available bromine is generally in the form of BrO, whereas usually only a small fraction of available chlorine is in the form of ClO. The unusually cold conditions that occur in the polar regions during winter cause the reservoir gases HCl and ClONO2 to undergo nearly complete conversion to ClO and related reactive gases. This conversion occurs through chemical reactions that take place on the surface or within polar stratospheric cloud (PSC) particles (see Q9).

Chlorine at midlatitudes. Reactive and reservoir chlorine gases have been observed extensively in the stratosphere using both local and remote measurement techniques, including observations from satellite instruments. The measurements from space displayed in Figure Q7-2 are representative of how the amounts of chlorine-containing gases change between the surface and the upper stratosphere at middle to high latitudes. Total chlorine (see red line in Figure Q7-2) is the sum of chlorine contained in halogen source gases (e.g., CFC-11, CFC-12) and in the reservoir and reactive gases (e.g., HCl, ClONO2, and ClO). Total chlorine is constant to within about 10% from the surface to above 50 km (31 miles) altitude. In the troposphere, total chlorine is contained almost entirely in the source gases described in Figure Q6-1. At higher altitudes, the source gases become a smaller fraction of total chlorine as they are converted to the reactive and reservoir chlorine gases. At the highest altitudes, total chlorine is all in the form of reactive and reservoir chlorine gases.

In the altitude range of the ozone layer at midlatitudes, as shown in Figure Q7-2, the reservoir gases HCl and ClONO2 account for most of the available chlorine. The abundance of ClO, the most important reactive gas in ozone depletion, is a small fraction of total chlorine. The abundance of ClO peaks in the upper stratosphere about 40 km (24.9 miles) above the surface. In this region of the atmosphere the abundance of ozone reached a minimum in the late 1990s, at about the time the abundance of ClO in the upper stratosphere maximized. In the lower and middle stratosphere (altitudes below about 30 km, or 18.6 miles above the surface), the low abundance of ClO tends to limit the amount of ozone destruction that occurs outside of polar regions.

Chlorine in polar regions. Chlorine gases in polar regions undergo large changes between autumn and late winter. Meteorological and chemical conditions in both polar regions are now routinely observed from space in all seasons. Maps of autumn and late winter conditions at an altitude of 18 km (11.2 miles), near the center of the ozone layer (see Figure Q11-3) over the Antarctic are contrasted in Figure Q7-3 These observations document dramatic differences in chemistry and temperature for these two seasons.

Ozone values are high over the entire Antarctic continent during autumn in the Southern Hemisphere. Temperatures are mid-range, HCl and nitric acid (HNO3) are high, and ClO is very low. High HCl indicates that substantial conversion of halogen source gases to this reservoir gas has occurred in the stratosphere. In the 1980s and early 1990s, the abundances of the reservoir gases HCl and ClONO2 increased substantially in the stratosphere following increased emissions of halogen source gases. HNO3 is an abundant, primarily naturally-occurring stratospheric compound that plays a major role in stratospheric ozone chemistry by both moderating ozone destruction and condensing to form polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs), thereby enabling conversion of chlorine reservoirs gases to ozone-destroying forms (see Q9). The low abundance of ClO indicates that little conversion of the reservoir to reactive gases occurs in autumn, thereby limiting chemical ozone destruction.

By late winter (September), a remarkable change in the composition of the Antarctic stratosphere has taken place. Low amounts of ozone reflect substantial depletion at 18 km altitude over an area larger than the Antarctic continent. Antarctic ozone holes arise from similar chemical destruction throughout much of the altitude range of the ozone layer (see altitude profile in Figure Q11-3). The meteorological and chemical conditions in late winter, characterized by very low temperatures, very low HCl and HNO3, and very high ClO, are distinctly different from those found in autumn. Low stratospheric temperatures occur during winter, when solar heating is reduced. Low HCl and high ClO reflect the conversion of the halogen reservoir compounds, HCl and ClONO2, to the most important reactive form of chlorine, ClO. This conversion occurs selectively in winter on PSCs, which form at very low temperatures (see Q9). Low HNO3 is indicative of its condensation to form these PSCs, some of which subsequently fall to lower altitudes through gravitational settling. High abundances of ClO generally cause ozone depletion to continue in the Antarctic region until mid- October (spring), when the lowest ozone values usually are observed (see Q10). As temperatures rise at the end of the winter, PSC formation is halted, ClO is converted back into the reservoir species HCl and ClONO2 (see Q9), and ozone destruction is curtailed.

Similar changes in meteorological and chemical conditions are also observed between autumn and late winter for some years in the Arctic, leading to substantial ozone loss. In spring of 2020, Arctic ozone reached exceptionally low values. A very stable, cold, and long-lived stratospheric Arctic vortex enabled halogen-catalyzed chemical ozone loss that exceeded the previous record-breaking loss observed in spring 2011 (see Q11). Substantial chemical loss of Arctic ozone will continue to occur in cold winters/springs, as long as the concentrations of ODSs are well above natural levels.

Bromine observations. Fewer measurements are available for reactive and reservoir bromine gases in the lower stratosphere than for chlorine gases. This difference arises in part because of the lower abundance of bromine, which makes quantification of its atmospheric abundance more challenging. The most widely observed bromine gas is BrO, which can be observed from space. Estimates of the concentration of available bromine in the stratosphere are higher than expected from the decomposition of halons and methyl bromide, the most important bromine source gases that are produced by human activities. This difference was the first direct evidence that very short-lived (VSL) bromine-containing source gases reach the stratosphere. Subsequently, direct observations of VSL source gases have confirmed their importance. In 2020, slightly more than one-quarter of the total stratospheric bromine is supplied by these naturally occurring, VSL source gases (see Q6).

Reactive gases containing chlorine and bromine destroy stratospheric ozone in “catalytic” cycles made up of two or more separate reactions. As a result, a single chlorine or bromine atom can destroy many thousands of ozone molecules before it leaves the stratosphere. In this way, a small amount of reactive chlorine or bromine has a large impact on the ozone layer. A special situation develops in polar regions in the late winter/early spring season, where large enhancements in the abundance of the most important reactive gas, chlorine monoxide, lead to severe ozone depletion.

Stratospheric ozone is destroyed by reactions involving reactive halogen gases, which are produced in the chemical conversion of halogen source gases (see Figure Q7-1). The most reactive of these gases are chlorine monoxide (ClO), bromine monoxide (BrO), and chlorine and bromine atoms (Cl and Br). These gases participate in three principal reaction cycles that destroy ozone.

Cycle 1. Ozone destruction Cycle 1 is illustrated in Figure Q8-1. The cycle is made up of two basic reactions: Cl + O3 and ClO + O. The net result of Cycle 1 is to convert one ozone molecule and one oxygen atom into two oxygen molecules. In each cycle, chlorine acts as a catalyst because ClO and Cl react and are reformed. In this way, one Cl atom participates in many cycles, destroying many ozone molecules. For typical stratospheric conditions at middle or low latitudes, a single chlorine atom can destroy thousands of ozone molecules before it happens to react with another gas, breaking the catalytic cycle. During the total time of its stay in the stratosphere, a chlorine atom can thus destroy many thousands of ozone molecules.

Polar Cycles 2 and 3. The abundance of ClO is greatly increased in polar regions during late winter and early spring, relative to other seasons, as a result of reactions on the surfaces of polar stratospheric clouds (see Q7 and Q9). Cycles 2 and 3 (see Figure Q8-2) become the dominant reaction mechanisms for polar ozone loss because of the high abundances of ClO and the relatively low abundance of atomic oxygen (which limits the rate of ozone loss by Cycle 1). Cycle 2 begins with the self-reaction of ClO. Cycle 3, which begins with the reaction of ClO with BrO, has two reaction pathways that produce either Cl and Br or BrCl. The net result of both cycles is to destroy two ozone molecules and create three oxygen molecules. Cycles 2 and 3 account for most of the ozone loss observed in the stratosphere over the Arctic and Antarctic regions in the late winter/early spring season (see Q10 and Q11). At high ClO abundances, the rate of polar ozone destruction can reach 2 to 3% per day.

Sunlight requirement. Sunlight is required to complete and maintain these reaction cycles. Cycle 1 requires ultraviolet (UV) radiation (a component of sunlight) that is strong enough to break apart molecular oxygen into atomic oxygen. Cycle 1 is most important in the stratosphere at altitudes above about 30 km (18.6 miles), where solar UV-C radiation (100 to 280 nanometer (nm) wavelengths) is most intense (see Figure Q2-1).

Cycles 2 and 3 also require sunlight. In the continuous darkness of winter in the polar stratosphere, reaction Cycles 2 and 3 cannot occur. Sunlight is needed to break apart (ClO)2 and BrCl, resulting in abundances of ClO and BrO large enough to drive rapid loss of ozone by Cycles 2 and 3. These cycles are most active when sunlight returns to the polar regions in late winter/early spring. Therefore, the greatest destruction of ozone occurs in the partially to fully sunlit periods after midwinter in the polar stratosphere.

Sunlight in the UV-A (315 to 400 nm wavelengths) and visible (400 to 700 nm wavelengths) parts of the spectrum needed in Cycles 2 and 3 is not sufficient to form ozone because this process requires more energetic solar UV-C solar radiation (see Q1 and Q2). In the late winter/early spring, only UV-A and visible solar radiation is present in the polar stratosphere, due to low Sun angles. As a result, the rate of ozone destruction by Cycles 2 and 3 in the sunlit polar stratosphere during springtime greatly exceeds the rate of ozone production.

Other reactions.. Global abundances of ozone are controlled by many other reactions (see Q1). Reactive hydrogen and reactive nitrogen gases, for example, are involved in catalytic ozone-destruction cycles, similar to those described above, that also take place in the stratosphere. Reactive hydrogen is supplied by the stratospheric decomposition of water (H2O) and methane (CH4). Methane emissions result from both natural sources and a wide variety of human activities. The abundance of stratospheric H2O is controlled by the temperature of the upper tropical troposphere as well as the decomposition of stratospheric CH4. Reactive nitrogen is supplied by the stratospheric decomposition of nitrous oxide (N2O), also emitted by natural sources and human activities. The importance of reactive hydrogen and nitrogen gases in ozone depletion relative to reactive halogen gases is expected to increase in the future because the atmospheric abundances of the reactive halogen gases are decreasing as a result of the Montreal Protocol, while abundances of CH4 and N2O are projected to increase due to various human activities (see Q20).

Ozone-depleting substances are present throughout the stratospheric ozone layer because they are transported great distances by atmospheric air motions. The severe depletion of the Antarctic ozone layer known as the "ozone hole" occurs because of particular meteorological and chemical conditions that exist there and nowhere else on the globe. The very low winter temperatures in the Antarctic stratosphere cause polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) to form. Specific chemical reactions that occur on PSCs, combined with the isolation of polar stratospheric air inside the polar vortex, allow chlorine and bromine reactions to produce the ozone hole over Antarctica in springtime.

The severe depletion of stratospheric ozone in late winter and early spring in the Antarctic is known as the "ozone hole" (see Q10). The ozone hole appears over Antarctica because meteorological and chemical conditions unique to this region increase the effectiveness of ozone destruction by reactive halogen gases (see Q7 and Q8). The formation of the Antarctic ozone hole requires the combination of temperatures low enough to form polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs), isolation of polar vortex air from air in other stratospheric regions, sunlight, and sufficient amounts of available chlorine (see Q8).

Distribution of halogen gases. Halogen source gases that are emitted at Earth's surface and have lifetimes longer than about 1 year (see Table Q6-1) are present in comparable amounts throughout the stratosphere in both hemispheres, even though most of the emissions occur in the Northern Hemisphere. The stratospheric abundances are comparable in both hemispheres because most long-lived source gases have no significant natural removal processes in the lower atmosphere, and because winds and convection redistribute and mix air efficiently throughout the troposphere on the timescale of weeks to months. Halogen source gases enter the stratosphere primarily from the tropical upper troposphere. Stratospheric air motions then transport these gases upward and toward the pole in both hemispheres.

Low polar temperatures. The severe ozone destruction that leads to the ozone hole requires low temperatures to be present over a range of stratospheric altitudes, over large geographical regions, and for an extended period of time. Low temperatures are important because they allow liquid and solid PSC particles to form. Chemical reactions within and on the surfaces of these PSC particles initiate a remarkable increase in the most important reactive chlorine gas, chlorine monoxide (ClO) (see below as well as Q7 and Q8). Air is usually too warm to enable the formation of clouds in the stratosphere. Only the polar regions during winter have temperatures low enough for stratospheric clouds to form, because air cools due to lack of sunlight. In the Antarctic winter, minimum daily temperatures are generally much lower and less variable than those in the Arctic winter (see Figure Q9-1). Antarctic temperatures also remain below PSC formation temperatures for much longer periods during winter. These and other meteorological differences occur because of variations between the hemispheres in the distributions of land, ocean, and mountains at middle and high latitudes. As a consequence, winter temperatures are low enough for PSCs to form somewhere in the Antarctic for nearly the entire winter (about 5 months), and only for limited periods (about 1 to 4 months) in the Arctic for most winters.

Isolated conditions. Stratospheric air in the polar regions is relatively isolated for long periods in the winter months. This isolation results from strong winds that encircle the poles during winter, forming a polar vortex, which prevents substantial transport and mixing of air into or out of the polar stratosphere. This circulation strengthens in winter as stratospheric temperatures decrease. The polar vortex circulation tends to be stronger in the Southern Hemisphere (SH) than in the Northern Hemisphere (NH), because northern latitudes have more mountainous regions and adjacent areas of ocean and land with contrasting temperatures than is present at southern latitudes. This situation leads to more meteorological disturbances in the circulation of the NH, which increase the mixing in of air from lower latitudes toward the pole, warming the Arctic stratosphere. Since winter temperatures are therefore lower in the SH than in the NH polar stratosphere, the isolation of air in the polar vortex is much more effective in the Antarctic than in the Arctic. Once temperatures drop low enough, PSCs form within the polar vortex and induce chemical changes such as an increase in the abundance of ClO (see Q8). These changes persist for many weeks to months due to the isolation of stratospheric air in the Antarctic.

Polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs). Chemical reactions within and on the surfaces of liquid and solid PSC particles can substantially increase the relative abundances of reactive chlorine gases. These reactions convert the reservoir forms of chlorine gases, hydrogen chloride (HCl) and chlorine nitrate (ClONO2) to the most important reactive form, ClO (see Figure Q7-3). The abundance of ClO increases from a small fraction of available chlorine to comprise more than half of all available chlorine (see Q7). With increased ClO, the catalytic cycles involving ClO and BrO become active in the chemical destruction of ozone whenever sunlight is available (see Q8).

Different types of liquid and solid PSC particles form when stratospheric temperatures fall below about -78°C (-108°F) in polar regions (see Figure Q9-1). As a result, PSCs are often found over large areas of the winter polar regions and over extensive altitude ranges in both hemispheres, with substantially larger regions and for longer time periods in the Antarctic than in the Arctic. The most common type of PSC forms from nitric acid (HNO3) and water condensing on pre-existing liquid sulfuric acid (H2SO4)-containing particles. Some of these particles freeze to form solid particles. At even lower temperatures (-85°C or -121°F), water condenses to form ice particles. PSC particles grow large enough and are numerous enough that cloud-like features can be observed from the ground under certain conditions, particularly when the Sun is near the horizon (see Figure Q9-2). PSCs are often found near mountain ranges in polar regions because the motion of air over the mountains can cause localized cooling in the stratosphere, which increases condensation of water and HNO3.

When average temperatures begin increasing in late winter, PSCs form less frequently, which slows down the conversion of chlorine from reservoir to reactive forms throughout the polar region. Without continued production, the abundance of ClO decreases as other chemical reactions re-form the reservoir gases, ClONO2 and HCl. When temperatures rise above PSC formation thresholds, usually sometime between late January and early March in the Arctic and by mid-October in the Antarctic (see Figure Q9-1), the most intense period of ozone depletion ends.

Nitric acid and water removal. Once formed, the largest PSC particles fall to lower altitudes because of gravity. The largest particles can descend several kilometers in the stratosphere within a few days during the low-temperature winter/spring period. Because PSCs often contain a significant fraction of available HNO3, their descent removes HNO3 from regions of the ozone layer. This process is called denitrification of the stratosphere. Because HNO3 is a source for nitrogen oxides (NOx) in the stratosphere, denitrification removes the NOx available for converting the highly reactive chlorine gas ClO back into the reservoir gas ClONO2. As a result, ClO remains chemically active for a longer period, thereby increasing chemical ozone destruction. Significant denitrification occurs each winter in the Antarctic and only for occasional winters in the Arctic, because PSC formation temperatures must be sustained over an extensive altitude region and time period to lead to denitrification (see Figure Q9-1).

Ice particles form at temperatures that are a few degrees lower than those required for PSC formation from HNO3. If these water ice particles grow large enough, their gravitational settling can remove a significant fraction of water vapor from regions of the ozone layer over the course of a winter. This process is called dehydration of the stratosphere. Because of the very low temperatures required to form ice, dehydration is common in the Antarctic and rare in the Arctic. The removal of water vapor does not directly affect the catalytic reactions that destroy ozone. Dehydration indirectly affects ozone destruction by suppressing PSC formation later in winter, which reduces the production of ClO by reactions on PSCs.

Discovering the role of PSCs. Ground-based observations of PSCs were available many decades before the role of PSCs in polar ozone destruction was recognized. The geographical and altitudinal extent of PSCs in both polar regions was not fully known until PSCs were observed by satellite instruments starting in the late 1970s. The role of PSC particles in converting reservoir chlorine gases to ClO was not understood until after the discovery of the Antarctic ozone hole in 1985. Our understanding of the chemical role of PSC particles developed from laboratory studies of their surface reactivity, computer modeling studies of polar stratospheric chemistry, and measurements that sampled particles and reactive chlorine gases, such as ClO, in the polar stratosphere.

Stratospheric ozone depletion

Severe depletion of the Antarctic ozone layer was first reported in the mid-1980s. Antarctic ozone depletion is seasonal, occurring primarily in late winter and early spring (August - November). Peak depletion occurs in early October when ozone is often completely destroyed over a range of stratospheric altitudes, thereby reducing total ozone by as much as two-thirds at some locations. This severe depletion creates the "ozone hole" apparent in images of Antarctic total ozone acquired using satellite instruments. In most years the maximum area of the ozone hole far exceeds the size of the Antarctic continent.

The severe depletion of Antarctic ozone, known as the "ozone hole", was first reported in the mid-1980s (see box in Q9). The depletion is attributable to chemical destruction by reactive halogen gases (see Q7 and Q8), which increased everywhere in the stratosphere in the latter half of the 20th century (see Q15). Conditions in the Antarctic winter and early spring stratosphere enhance ozone depletion because of (1) the long periods of extremely low temperatures during polar night, which cause polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) to form; (2) the large abundance of reactive halogen gases produced in reactions on PSCs; and (3) the isolation of polar stratospheric air, which allows time for chemical destruction processes to occur after the return of sunlight. The severity of Antarctic ozone depletion as well as long-term changes can be seen using satellite observations of total ozone and profiles of ozone versus altitude.

Antarctic ozone hole. The most widely used images of Antarctic ozone depletion are derived from measurements of total ozone made with satellite instruments. A map of Antarctic early spring measurements shows a large region centered near the South Pole in which total ozone is highly depleted (see Figure Q10-1). This region has come to be called the "ozone hole" because of the near-circular contours of low ozone values in the maps. The reported area of the ozone hole for a given year is defined here as the geographical region within the 220-Dobson unit (DU) contour in total ozone maps (see white line in Figure Q10-1) averaged between 21-30 September. The area reached a maximum of 28 million square km (about 11 million square miles) in 2006, which is more than twice the area of the Antarctic continent (see Figure Q10-2). Minimum values of total ozone inside the ozone hole averaged in late September to mid-October are near 120 DU, which is only one-third of the springtime values of about 350 DU observed in the early 1970s (see Figures Q10-3 and Q11-1). Low total ozone inside the ozone hole contrasts strongly with the distribution of much larger values outside the ozone hole. This common feature can be seen in Figure Q10-1, where a broad geographic region with values of total ozone around 350 DU surrounds the ozone hole in September 2021, revealing the edge of the polar vortex that acts as a barrier to the transport of ozone-rich midlatitude air into the polar region (see Q9).

Altitude profiles of Antarctic ozone. The low total ozone values within the ozone hole are caused by nearly complete removal of ozone in the lower stratosphere. Balloon-borne ozone instruments (see Q4) demonstrate that this depletion occurs within the ozone layer, the altitude region that normally contains the highest abundances of ozone. At geographic locations with the lowest total ozone values, ozonesonde measurements show that the chemical destruction of ozone has often been complete over an altitude region of up to several kilometers. For example, in the ozone profile over South Pole, Antarctica on 10 October 2020 (see red line in left panel of Figure Q11-3), ozone abundances are essentially zero over the altitude region from 14 to 20 km. The lowest winter temperatures and highest abundances of reactive chlorine (ClO) occur in this altitude region (see Figure Q7-3). The differences in the South Pole ozone profiles averaged over 1967-1971 and over 1990-2021 in Figure Q11-3 show how reactive halogen gases have dramatically altered the ozone layer. For the 1967-1971 time period, a normal ozone layer is clearly evident in the October average profile, with a peak near 16 km altitude. In the 1990-2021 average profile, a broad minimum centered near 16 km is observed, with ozone values reduced at some altitudes by up to 90% relative to normal values.

Long-term total ozone changes. Prior to 1960, the amount of reactive halogen gases in the stratosphere was insufficient to cause significant chemical loss of Antarctic ozone. Ground-based observations show that the steady decline in total ozone over the Halley Bay research station (76°S) (see box in Q9) during each October first became apparent in the early 1970s.

Satellite observations reveal that in 1979, total ozone during October near the South Pole was slightly lower than found at other high southerly latitudes (see Figure 10-3). Computer model simulations indicate that Antarctic ozone depletion actually began in the early 1960s. Until the early 1980s, depletion of total ozone was not large enough to result in minimum values falling below the 220-DU threshold that is now commonly used to denote the boundary of the ozone hole (see Figure Q10-1). Starting in the mid-1980s, a region of total ozone well below 220 DU centered over the South Pole became apparent in satellite maps of October total ozone (see Figure Q10-3). Observations of total ozone from satellite instruments can be used in multiple ways to examine how ozone depletion has changed in the Antarctic region over the past 50 years, including:

  • First, ozone hole areas displayed in Figure Q10-2 show that the area of depletion increased after 1980, then became fairly stable in the 1990s, 2000s, and into the mid-2010s, often reaching an area of 25 million square km (about the size of North America). Exceptions are the unexpectedly low areas of depletion observed in 2002 and 2019, which are explained in the box at the end of this Question.

  • Second, minimum Antarctic ozone amounts displayed in Figure Q10-2 show that the severity of the depletion increased beginning around 1980 along with the rise in the ozone hole area. Fairly constant minimum values of total ozone, near 110 DU, were observed in the 1990s and 2000s, with the exceptions of 2002 and 2019. There is some indication of an increase in the minimum value of total ozone since the early 2010s. However, in 2020 and 2021 unusually cold conditions produced large and long-lasting ozone holes, whereas in 2019 a weather disturbance resulted in a small, shallow ozone hole (see box). The ozone holes of 2019, 2020, and 2021 demonstrate the importance of year-to-year variability in ozone hole conditions, which challenges the identification of recovery due to declining levels of ODSs.

  • Third, total ozone maps over the Antarctic and surrounding regions Figure Q10-3 show how the ozone hole has developed over time. October averages show the absence of an ozone hole in the 1970s, the extent of the ozone hole around the time of its discovery in 1985 (see box in Q9), followed by the progression throughout the 1990s, the 2010s, and into the early 2020s.

  • Fourth, values of total ozone averaged poleward of 63°S for each October (Figure Q11-1) show how total ozone has changed in the Antarctic region. After decreasing steeply in the early years of the ozone hole, polar-cap averages of total ozone are now approximately 30% smaller than those in pre-ozone hole years (1970-1982). Increased year-to-year variability in Antarctic-region ozone is evident since 2000.

Disappearance of the Antarctic ozone hole in spring. Severe depletion of Antarctic ozone occurs each spring. In mid-October, temperatures in the polar lower stratosphere begin to increase (see Figure Q9-1), eventually rising to a level that prevents the formation of PSCs and production of ClO. Consequently, the most effective chemical cycles that destroy ozone are curtailed (see Q8). Typically, the polar vortex breaks down during late November or early December, ending the isolation of high-latitude air and increasing the exchange of air between the Antarctic stratosphere and lower latitudes. This exchange allows substantial amounts of ozone-rich air to be transported poleward, where it displaces or mixes with air depleted in ozone. As a result of these large-scale transport and mixing processes, the ozone hole typically disappears by mid-December.

Long-term recovery of the Antarctic ozone hole.There are emerging indications that the size and maximum ozone depletion (severity) of the Antarctic ozone hole has diminished since 2000. The signature of recovery is clearest during September, which is early spring in the Southern Hemisphere. Although accounting for the effect of natural variability on the size and depth of the ozone hole is challenging, the weight of evidence suggests that the decline in the amount of reactive halogen gases in the stratosphere since 2000 has made a substantial contribution to the observed reductions in the size and depth of the ozone hole during September. The reduction of Antarctic ozone depletion leading to full recovery of total ozone back to the value observed in the early 1980s requires continued, sustained reductions of ozone-depleting substances in the stratosphere. Even with the halogen source gas reductions already underway (see Q15), the return of Antarctic total ozone to 1980 values is not expected to occur until the mid-2060s (see Q20).

Yes, significant depletion of the Arctic ozone layer now occurs in most years in the late winter and early spring period (January - March). However, Arctic ozone depletion is less severe than that observed in the Antarctic and exhibits larger year-to-year differences as a consequence of the more variable meteorological conditions found in the Arctic polar stratosphere. Even the most severe Arctic ozone depletion does not lead to total ozone amounts as low as those seen in the Antarctic, because Arctic ozone abundances during early winter before the onset of ozone depletion are much larger than those in the Antarctic. Consequently, an extensive and recurrent "ozone hole", as found in the Antarctic stratosphere, does not occur in the Arctic.

Significant depletion of ozone has been observed in the Arctic stratosphere in recent decades. The depletion is attributable to chemical destruction by reactive halogen gases (see Q8), which increased in the stratosphere in the latter half of the 20th century (see Q15). Arctic depletion also occurs in the late winter/early spring period (January - March), however over a somewhat shorter period than in the Antarctic (July - October). Similar to the Antarctic (see Q10), Arctic ozone depletion occurs because of (1) periods of very low temperatures, which lead to the formation of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs); (2) the large abundance of reactive halogen gases produced in reactions on PSCs; and (3) the isolation of polar stratospheric air, which allows time for chemical destruction processes to occur after the return of sunlight. However, these conditions occur less often in the Arctic than in the Antarctic.

Total ozone observed in the Arctic during spring (see Figure Q11-1), even for years with significant ozone depletion, is higher than is commonly observed in the Antarctic during spring. Extensive and recurrent ozone holes as found in the Antarctic stratosphere do not occur in the Arctic. Stratospheric ozone abundances during early winter, before the onset of ozone depletion, are naturally higher in the Arctic than in the Antarctic because transport of ozone from its source region in the tropics to higher latitudes is more vigorous in the Northern Hemisphere. Furthermore, ozone depletion is limited because, in comparison to Antarctic conditions, average temperatures in the Arctic stratosphere are always significantly higher (see Figure Q9-1) and the isolation of polar stratospheric air is less effective (see Q9). These differences occur because northern latitudes have a greater prevalence of mountainous regions and contrasting areas of ocean and land than southern latitudes (compare Figures Q10-3 and Q11-2), which creates more meteorological disturbances that warm the Arctic stratosphere (see box in Q10). Consequently, the extent and timing of Arctic ozone depletion varies considerably from year to year.

Arctic ozone depletion in some winter/spring seasons occurs over many weeks, in others only for brief periods. These differences are controlled by the stability of and temperature within the Arctic vortex circulation system. Meteorological conditions affect the strength of the circulation of air in the Arctic stratosphere and the amount of ozone transported to the polar region. When the Arctic vortex is weak and disrupted, the polar region has larger amounts of ozone since temperatures are higher than normal and more ozone is transported by the winds to high latitudes. In contrast, a strong and stable vortex leads to lower-than-normal amounts of total ozone in the Arctic due to both more severe chemical loss and weaker poleward transport of ozone.

Long-term total ozone changes. Two important ways in which satellite observations can be used are to examine the average total ozone abundances in the Arctic region for the last half century and to contrast these values with Antarctic abundances.

  • First, total ozone averaged poleward of 63°N for each March shows how total ozone has changed in the Arctic (see Figure Q11-1). The seasonal poleward and downward transport of ozone-rich air is naturally stronger in the Northern Hemisphere. As a result, before ozone depletion begins normal Arctic values are close to 450 DU while Antarctic values are close to 330 DU. Changes in total ozone from the 1970-1982 average value (horizontal line in Figure Q11-1) are due to a combination of chemical destruction by halogens and meteorological (natural) variations. In the last quarter century, these two aspects have contributed about equally to the observed year-to-year variations of ozone in the Arctic. Decreases from pre-ozone-hole average values (1970-1982) were observed in the Arctic by the mid-1980s, when larger changes were already occurring in the Antarctic. The decreases in total ozone in the Arctic are generally much smaller than those found in the Antarctic and lead to total ozone values that are typically about 10 to 20% below normal. Maximum decreases in total ozone of about 30% observed in March 1997, 2011, and 2020 for considerable regions of the Arctic (see Figure Q11-2) are the most comparable to Antarctic depletion. In all three Arctic winters, meteorological conditions inhibited transport of ozone-rich air to high latitudes, and in 2011 and 2020 persistently low temperatures facilitated severe chemical depletion of ozone by reactive halogens (see Q8).

  • Second, total ozone maps over the Arctic and surrounding regions (see Figure Q11-2) show year-to-year changes in total ozone during March. In the 1970s, total ozone values were near 450 DU when averaged over the Arctic region in March. Beginning in the 1990s and continuing until present, values above 450 DU have been increasingly absent from the March average maps. A comparison of the maps in the 1970s and 2020, for example, shows a striking reduction of total ozone throughout the Arctic region. The large geographical extent of low total ozone in the March maps for years 1997, 2011, and 2020 represent exceptional events in the Arctic observational record of the last five decades, as noted above in the discussion of Figure Q11-1. The large-scale differences between Arctic ozone distributions observed in March 2011, 2014, 2020, and 2021 are a prime example of the influence of meteorology in driving year-to-year variations in Arctic ozone depletion. Despite the decline in the concentration of reactive gases in the polar stratosphere beginning around year 2000, there is little evidence of recovery of Arctic ozone. Detection of ozone recovery for the Arctic is made difficult by the smaller amount of depletion compared to the Antarctic, combined with larger natural variability in the year-to-year changes in the amount of Arctic ozone.

Altitude profiles of Arctic ozone. As in the Antarctic, Arctic ozone is measured using a variety of instruments (see Q4). These measurements document daily to seasonal changes within the ozone layer. Spring Arctic and Antarctic balloon-borne ozone measurements are shown in Figure Q11-3. Arctic profiles were obtained from the Ny-Ålesund research station at 79°N. For 1990-2021, the March average reveals the presence of a substantial ozone layer, contrasting sharply with the severely depleted Antarctic ozone layer in the October average over the same time period. This contrast further demonstrates how higher stratospheric temperatures, more variable meteorology, and larger amounts of ozone present in mid-winter have protected the Arctic ozone layer from having extended altitude regions of near-zero ozone as regularly occurs in the Antarctic, despite there being similar abundances of halogen gases (see Q7) in the two regions.

The Arctic profiles shown in Figure Q11-3 for 4 April 2011 and 28 March 2020 are two of the most severely depleted in the 30-year record from Ny-Ålesund. Arctic ozone reached exceptionally low values in the spring of 2020 due to the presence of a very stable, cold, and long-lived polar vortex that led to lower-than-normal poleward transport of ozone and enabled extensive halogen-catalyzed chemical loss of ozone, which exceeded the previous record-breaking loss in spring 2011 (see Figure Q11-1). Chemical loss averaged over the Arctic vortex for March 2020 is estimated to be about 120 DU, nearly equal to the difference between the total ozone values associated with the 28 March 2020 profile and the 1991-2021 average profile shown in Figure Q11-3. Chemical loss of Arctic ozone in spring 2020 is similar in magnitude to the loss that regularly occurs over Antarctica.

Substantial chemical loss of Arctic ozone will continue to occur during cold winters and springs, as long as the concentrations of ODSs are well above natural levels. Although significant, the Arctic ozone depletion during both 2011 and 2020 resulted in amounts of ozone between 15 and 20 km altitude that are substantially larger than routinely observed in the Antarctic during October, such as in the profile from 10 October 2020 shown in Figure Q11-3. In the Antarctic stratosphere, near-complete depletion of ozone over many kilometers in altitude and over areas almost as large as North America is a common occurrence (see Figure Q10-2).

Restoring ozone in spring. As in the Antarctic, ozone depletion in the Arctic is largest in the late winter/early spring season. In spring, temperatures in the polar lower stratosphere increase (see Figure Q9-1), halting the formation of PSCs, the production of ClO, and the chemical cycles that destroy ozone. The breakdown of the polar vortex ends the isolation of air in the high-latitude region, allowing more ozone-rich air to be transported poleward, where it displaces or mixes with air in which ozone may have been depleted. As a result of these large-scale transport and mixing processes, the signature of large-scale and extensive ozone depletion at high northern latitudes typically disappears by April or earlier.

The abundance of total ozone between 60°S and 60°N is now about 2-3% below the amount present during 1964-1980. The abundance of total ozone in this region declined steadily throughout the 1980s due to the increases in reactive halogen gases in the stratosphere resulting from human activities. In the early 1990s, due to additional ozone loss that followed the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo, total ozone between 60°S to 60°N was depleted by 5% relative to the 1964-1980 average, the maximum depletion observed over the past six decades. In both hemispheres, total ozone depletion is small near the equator and increases toward the poles. The larger depletion at higher latitudes, particularly in the Southern Hemisphere, is driven in part by the late winter/early spring destruction of polar ozone, which influences ozone at lower latitudes following the breakdown of the polar vortex in each hemisphere.

Decreases in total ozone averaged over 60°S to 60°N, termed here global ozone, first became apparent in the 1980s (see Figure Q12-1) due to the rise in stratospheric halogens that result from human activities (see Figure Q15-1). Most of the depletion has occurred in the stratospheric ozone layer, where most ozone resides (see Figure Q1-2). Following the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in June 1991, global ozone in the early 1990s reached a minimum value that was 5% lower than the 1964-1980 average. This massive volcanic eruption dramatically increased the number of sulfuric acid-containing particles throughout the stratosphere. These particles significantly increased the effectiveness of reactive halogen gases in destroying ozone (see Q13). and, thereby, decreased global ozone by an additional 2% relative to its long-term trend for several years following the eruption. Since the mid-1990s, global ozone has gradually increased, due to the recovery of the ozone layer from this volcanically-induced perturbation as well as the slow, steady decline in stratospheric halogens driven by the Montreal Protocol (see Q14). Since 2010, global ozone has been about 2 to 3% below the 1964-1980 average.

Polar regions.Observed total ozone depletion varies significantly with latitude across the globe. The largest reductions occur at high southern latitudes as a result of the severe ozone loss over Antarctica each year during winter/spring (see Q9 and Q10). The next largest depletion is observed in the high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, caused in part by winter losses over the Arctic in some years (see Q11). Since ozone loss in polar regions is described extensively in the answers to other questions, the focus below is on the 60°S-60°N region, where the vast majority of the world's population resides.

Midlatitude regions. Ozone depletion is also observed at midlatitudes. Present-day (2017-2020 average) total ozone at midlatitudes of the Southern Hemisphere (SH) (35°S-60°S) is about 5% below the 1964-1980 average, whereas total ozone at midlatitudes of the Northern Hemisphere (NH) (35°N-60°N) is about 4% below the 1964-1980 average (see Figure Q12-1). Midlatitude ozone depletion has two contributing factors. First, ozone-depleted air over both polar regions is dispersed away from the poles during and after each winter/spring period, thereby reducing ozone at midlatitudes. Second, chemical destruction of ozone occurs at midlatitudes, contributing to the observed reductions in these regions. Ozone depletion at midlatitudes is much smaller than in polar regions (see Figure Q20-1) because the amount of reactive and reservoir halogen gases is lower and the dramatic seasonal increase of ClO, the most important reactive halogen gas (see Figure Q7-3), does not occur at midlatitudes. The slightly larger depletion of ozone at SH midlatitudes, compared to NH midlatitudes, is caused by the dispersion of air from the Antarctic ozone hole.

Tropical region. Total ozone in the tropics (20°S-20°N latitude) has been only weakly affected by chemical depletion. Present-day total ozone in the tropics is about 1% below the 1964-1980 average. In the tropical lower stratosphere, air is transported from the lower atmosphere (troposphere) over about an 18-month period. As a result, the fraction of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) (halogen source gases) that is converted to reactive and reservoir halogen gases (see Figure Q7-1) is small. With little reactive and reservoir halogen gases available, total ozone depletion in this region is also small. In addition, net ozone production occurs in the tropics because of high average amounts of solar ultraviolet radiation. In contrast, stratospheric air in polar regions has been in the stratosphere for about 4 to 7 years, allowing time for significant conversion of ODSs to reactive and reservoir halogen gases (see Figure Q5-1). These systematic differences in the composition of stratospheric air are a consequence of large-scale atmospheric transport: air enters the stratosphere in the tropics, moves poleward in both hemispheres, and then descends and ultimately returns to the troposphere in the middle to high latitudes.

Ozone recovery. The Montreal Protocol, strengthened by its amendments and adjustments, has successfully controlled the production and consumption of ODSs, which act to destroy the ozone layer (see Q14). As a result, a quantity termed equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC; the total chlorine and bromine abundances in the stratosphere) peaked in the late 1990s and is now decreasing (see Q6 and Q15). An increase in upper stratospheric ozone coincident with the decline in EESC is well documented, constituting an important initial sign of the recovery of the ozone layer. However, ozone in the upper stratosphere makes only a small contribution to total ozone.

The depletion of total ozone over 1979 to 1995 varies as a function of latitude, with the largest losses occurring at the highest latitudes in both hemispheres (see Figure Q12-2). Over this time period EESC nearly doubled. The pattern of ozone loss as a function of latitude is caused by two factors: 1) the tendency for larger levels of reactive and reservoir halogen gases to be present at higher latitudes due to the pattern of large-scale atmospheric transport along with the time required for significant conversion of ODSs to reactive and reservoir halogen gases as described above (see Q5 and Q7) and 2) greater influence of the dispersal of severely ozone-depleted air from the Antarctic (Q10) and Arctic (Q11) vortices at the end of their respective winters at the higher latitudes.

Over the time period 1996 to 2020, there has been a rise in total ozone of 0.4 % per decade averaged over 60°S-60°N (see Figures Q12-1 and Q12-2) that is consistent with the decline in the abundance of ODSs (see Q14 and Q15). The data indicate most of this increase in total ozone occurs between 35°-60° of the Southern Hemisphere. For the tropics (20°S-20°N), trends in total ozone over 1996 to 2020 are small and not statistically significant. The abundance of EESC at midlatitudes declined by about 15% from 1996 to 2020. The smaller decline of EESC over this 24-year time period compared to the doubling of EESC over the shorter 1979 to 1995 time period is due to the long lifetime for atmospheric removal of ODSs (see Table Q6-1), combined with the rapid growth in the emissions of ODSs in the 1970s and 1980s (see Figure Q0-1). The small increase in ozone shown in Figure Q12-2 for 1996 to 2020 is consistent with the scientific community's current understanding of the processes that control the abundance of atmospheric ozone.

Identifying an ozone increase that is attributable to the observed decrease in the amount of ODSs is challenging because halogen levels are not the only factor that determines the abundance of stratospheric ozone. Total ozone declined over most of the globe (60°S-60°N) during the 1980s and early 1990s, reaching a minimum in 1993 due to the combined effects of ODSs and the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in 1991 (see Figures Q12-1 and Q13-1). This global ozone minimum was observed half a decade before the EESC maximum was reached due to the strong global ozone response to enhanced amounts of stratospheric sulfate aerosol after the volcanic eruption of Mount Pinatubo, which led to increased ozone depletion for several years. Observed global ozone increases in the mid-1990s were caused by the steady removal of volcanic aerosol from the stratosphere by natural processes, which occurred at the time EESC was approaching its maximum (see Q13).

Another factor complicating the identification of ozone recovery in different regions of the atmosphere is the year-to-year variation of the stratospheric circulation. In most regions of the atmosphere, these variations lead to ozone variability that is currently still larger than the increases in ozone expected from the observed decrease in EESC. Finally, increases in greenhouse gases (GHGs) such as carbon dioxide (CO2), which warm the lower atmosphere, affect ozone by decreasing stratospheric temperatures and by strengthening the stratospheric circulation. A colder stratosphere slows down the rate of ozone loss reactions (outside of polar regions), while a stronger circulation enhances the transport of ozone from the tropics to middle and high latitudes.

The impact on stratospheric ozone from accumulated emissions of most ODSs will continue for several decades because of the long atmospheric lifetime of these gases. Assuming compliance with the Montreal Protocol, EESC will continue to decline over the coming decades and will return to pre-1980 levels around 2066 (see Figure Q15-1). Increases in the abundance of most GHGs are expected to accelerate this EESC-driven return of the global ozone layer to pre-1980 levels. However, not all ozone-depleting gases are halogen compounds. Nitrous oxide (N2O), a GHG with sources attributed to natural processes and various human activities, is projected to increase in the future, which will result in additional ozone depletion (see Q20). Finally, as long as atmospheric abundances of ODSs remain elevated, the possibility of substantial reductions in total ozone following major volcanic eruptions (see Q13) will persist.

Yes, factors such as changes in solar radiation and the formation of stratospheric aerosol particles after explosive volcanic eruptions do influence the ozone layer. Global ozone abundances vary by 1-2% between the maximum and minimum of the 11-year solar cycle. The abundance of global ozone decreased by about 2% for a few years after the June 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo, due to volcanic enhancement of stratospheric sulfate aerosols. However, neither factor can explain the observed decrease in global total ozone or the severe ozone depletion observed in polar regions over the past half century. The primary influence on long-term changes in total global ozone is the abundance of stratospheric halogens.

Changes in solar radiation and increases in stratospheric aerosols (small particles) from volcanic eruptions both affect the abundance of stratospheric ozone. Global total ozone in the early 1990s decreased by about 5% when compared to the 1964-1980 average, and is now about 2 to 3% below this value (see Q12). The long-term depletion of ozone is primarily attributed to increases in halogen source gases, with additional depletion in the early 1990s associated with the volcanic eruption of Mount Pinatubo. Equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC) (see definition in Q15) is often used as a measure of the potential of reactive and reservoir halogen gases to deplete ozone. Comparisons of the long-term changes in solar radiation, stratospheric volcanic aerosol, and EESC are useful in evaluating the contribution of these factors to long-term changes in total ozone.

Total ozone and solar changes. The formation of stratospheric ozone is initiated by ultraviolet (UV) radiation emitted by the Sun (see Q1). As a result, an increase in the Sun's UV radiation output increases the amount of ozone in Earth's atmosphere. Since the 1960s, ground-based and satellite instruments have recorded variations in the total energy emitted by the Sun, which is well correlated with changes in solar UV radiation. The Sun's radiation output varies over the well-documented 11-year solar cycle, as shown in Figure Q13-1. in the quantity labeled incoming solar radiation. The long-term solar record exhibits alternating maximum and minimum values of total output, with maximum values separated by about 11 years. Global total ozone is relatively high compared to surrounding years during times of solar maxima and is relatively low during solar minima due to the sensitivity of ozone production to UV radiation, which increases during solar maxima. Analysis of measurements of ozone and incoming solar radiation shown in Figure Q13-1 shows that ozone levels vary by 1 to 2% between the maximum and minimum of a typical solar cycle. In addition to this 11-year variation, the total ozone record exhibits a long-term downward trend from the early 1980s to the early 2000s. If a decline in incoming solar radiation were the primary cause of the long-term decline in global total ozone, then the solar radiation would exhibit a similar long-term decrease. Instead, incoming solar radiation varies about a stable baseline over the modern instrument record. This comparison demonstrates that the observed long-term decline in global total ozone does not result from changes in the Sun's UV radiation output.

Total ozone and past volcanoes. Explosive volcanic eruptions inject sulfur gases directly into the stratosphere, causing new sulfate aerosol particles to be produced. These particles initially form downwind of the volcano and then disperse over large regions, as air is transported by stratospheric winds. The largest impact on global ozone usually takes place after explosive volcanic eruptions in the tropics, because the stratospheric circulation efficiently spreads tropical volcanic plumes to both hemispheres. A principal method of detecting the presence of volcanic particles in the stratosphere is to measure the transmission of solar radiation through the stratosphere to the ground, which is termed stratospheric aerosol optical depth (SAOD). When large amounts of new particles form over an extensive region of the stratosphere, SAOD increases and solar transmission is measurably reduced. Figure Q13-1 shows the long-term record of SAOD averaged over the entire stratosphere, based on measurements from ground-based and satellite instruments. Large increases in SAOD (reductions in solar transmission) are apparent after the explosive eruptions of Mount Agung (1963), Volcán de Fuego (1974), El Chichón (1982), and Mount Pinatubo (1991), all of which occurred in the tropics. Reduced transmission of solar radiation persists for a few years after each of these eruptions, until the stratospheric circulation and gravitational settling bring the volcanic sulfate aerosol particles back to the troposphere, where they are removed by precipitation.

Volcanic aerosol is primarily composed of sulfur compounds (sulfate). Chemical reactions on the surface of sulfate aerosol particles destroy stratospheric ozone by increasing the abundance of chlorine monoxide (ClO), a highly reactive chlorine gas (see Q7). The extent of ozone depletion depends on both the amount of sulfate aerosol produced following the eruption and the value of EESC (see Q15). Global ozone decreased for a few years following the eruptions of Mount Agung, Volcán de Fuego, El Chichón, and Mount Pinatubo. The ozone reduction from the eruption of Mount Pinatubo stands out in the global ozone record because it occurred at a time when EESC was near its peak and the perturbation to stratospheric sulfate aerosol was especially large (see Figures Q12-1 and Q13-1). Analysis of ozone observations shows that global total ozone declined by about 2% following the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in June 1991, and that this effect persisted for 2 to 3 years after the eruption. At times of relatively low EESC, such as the early 1960s, total ozone is not as sensitive to a volcanically induced increase in stratospheric aerosol as during current times, when values of EESC are much higher than background levels.

If changes in the abundance of volcanic aerosol in the stratosphere were the primary cause of the long-term decline in global total ozone, then the record of stratospheric aerosol optical depth (marker of volcanic sulfate particles) would exhibit a slow, gradual rise. Instead, stratospheric volcanic aerosol has been quite low since 1995, a period of time over which global total ozone has been about 2 to 3% below the 1964-1980 value. The data record shown in Figure Q13-1 provides evidence that the long-term decrease in global total ozone relative to the 1964-1980 average does not result from changes in volcanic aerosol.

Total ozone and EESC. Values of EESC are derived from surface observations of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) and represent the potential for ozone depletion from halogens at particular times and locations of the stratosphere (see Q15). The EESC record for the midlatitude, lower stratosphere rose well above the natural background level in the 1980s, peaked in 1998, and in 2022 was 18% below the peak value. The bottom panel of Figure Q13-1 compares the observed long-term record of global total ozone (magenta line) to the variation in ozone attributed to the changes in EESC (blue dashed line). This attribution curve is computed by a statistical model that considers the effects on ozone of EESC, stratospheric sulfur containing particles, variations in the total energy of incoming solar radiation, as well as a few factors related to changes in stratospheric circulation. The observed record of global total ozone follows the same general tendencies of the EESC attribution curve over the past half century, providing strong evidence that changes in stratospheric halogens in response to human activities are the primary factor responsible for the long-term variation of ozone depletion. Further evidence linking ODSs and long-term variations in total column ozone is provided by the climate-chemistry model simulations highlighted in Q20.

Halogen gases from volcanic eruptions. Explosive volcanic eruptions have the potential to inject halogens directly into the stratosphere, in the form of gases such as hydrogen chloride (HCl), bromine monoxide (BrO), and iodine monoxide (IO). Although HCl does not react directly with ozone, stratospheric injections of HCl and other chlorine-containing gases following explosive volcanic eruptions can lead, through chemical reactions, to elevated amounts of reactive chlorine monoxide (ClO) that destroys ozone (see Figure Q7-3). Eruption plumes also contain a considerable amount of water vapor, which forms rainwater and ice in the rising fresh plume. Rainwater and ice efficiently scavenge and remove HCl while the plume is still in the lower atmosphere (troposphere). Most of the HCl in the explosive plume of Mount Pinatubo did not enter the stratosphere because of this scavenging by precipitation. The amount of injected halogens depends on the chemical composition of the magma, conditions of the eruption such as its explosivity and the local meteorology. Recent analyses of several historic, extremely large volcanic eruptions show the potential for quite large ozone loss from the stratospheric injection of halogens. A volcanic eruption of this nature has not occurred during the time period of the modern observational record.

Antarctic volcanoes. Volcanoes on the Antarctic continent are of special interest due to their close proximity to the Antarctic ozone hole. An explosive eruption could in principle inject volcanic aerosol or halogens directly into the stratosphere over Antarctica and contribute to ozone depletion. To be a possible cause of the annually recurring ozone hole beginning in the early 1980s, explosive eruptions of Antarctic volcanoes large enough to inject material into the stratosphere would need to have occurred at least every few years. This is not the case. Mount Erebus and Deception Island are the only two currently active volcanoes in Antarctica. No explosive eruptions of these volcanoes, or any other Antarctic volcano, have occurred since 1980. Explosive volcanic eruptions in the last three decades have not caused the Antarctic ozone hole and, as noted above, have not been sufficient to cause the long-term depletion of global total ozone.

Total ozone and future volcanoes. The abundance of EESC will remain high for much of the 21st century due to the long atmospheric lifetime of ODSs (see Figure Q15-1). With its slow decline, EESC will remain above the 1960 value throughout this century. Consequently, throughout the rest of this century, increases in the abundance of stratospheric sulfate aerosol particles caused by large volcanic eruptions similar to Mount Pinatubo have the potential to reduce global total ozone values for a few years. The ozone layer will be most vulnerable to such an eruption until midcentury, since EESC is projected to return to the 1980 value around 2066. Following an explosive eruption much larger than Mount Pinatubo, or an eruption that injects halogens into the stratosphere, peak ozone losses could both be greater than previously observed and persist for longer periods of time.

Controlling ozone-depleting substances

Yes, the production and consumption of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) are controlled under a 1987 international agreement known as the “Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer” and its subsequent amendments and adjustments. The Protocol, now ratified by 198 parties, establishes legally binding controls on the global production and consumption of ODSs. Production and consumption of controlled ODSs by developed and developing nations will be almost completely phased out by 2030.

The Vienna Convention and the Montreal Protocol. In 1985, a treaty called the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer was signed by 26 nations. The signing nations agreed to take appropriate measures to protect the ozone layer from human activities. The Vienna Convention was a framework agreement that supported research, exchange of information, and future protocols. In response to growing concern, the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer was signed in 1987 and, following ratification, entered into force in 1989. The Protocol has been successful in establishing and enforcing legally binding controls for developed and developing nations on the production and consumption of halogen source gases known to cause ozone depletion. Halogen source gases containing chlorine and bromine that are emitted by human activities and are controlled under the Montreal Protocol are referred to as ozone-depleting substances (ODSs). National consumption of an ODS is defined as production plus imports of the controlled substance, minus exports of the substance. Inadvertent emissions of ODSs used as feedstock (raw material used to synthesize other substances through a process of chemical transformation) are not controlled by the Montreal Protocol. Nations are, however, required to report imports, exports, and production of ODSs used as feedstocks. The Protocol provisions are structured for developed countries to act first and for developing countries to follow with financial assistance, technology transfer, and the sharing of knowledge for mitigation of emissions of ODSs as well as the destruction of ODSs within equipment or products. In 2009, the Montreal Protocol became the first multilateral environmental agreement to achieve universal ratification.

Amendments and Adjustments. As the scientific basis of ozone depletion became more certain after 1987 and substitutes and alternatives became available to replace ODSs, the Montreal Protocol was strengthened with amendments and adjustments. Each amendment is named after the city in which the Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol took place and by the year of the meeting. The timeline in Figure Figure Q0-1 shows some of the major decisions that have been adopted. These decisions brought additional ODSs under control, accelerated the timing of existing control measures, or prescribed phaseout dates for the production and consumption of certain gases. The initial Protocol measures were a 50% reduction in chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) production and consumption by 1998 and a freeze on halon production and consumption. The 1990 London Amendment called for a phaseout of the production and consumption of the most damaging ODSs in developed nations by 2000 and in developing nations by 2010. The 1992 Copenhagen Amendment accelerated the phaseout date for CFCs, halons, carbon tetrachloride, and methyl chloroform to 1996 in developed nations and also initiated controls on future production and consumption of hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) in developed nations. Further controls on ODSs were agreed upon in later meetings in Vienna (1995), Montreal (1997, 2007), and Beijing (1999). The latest development is the 2016 Kigali Amendment (see Q19), which expanded the Montreal Protocol to control production and consumption of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) with high global warming potentials (GWPs) (see Table Q6-1). As explained below, HFCs are greenhouses gases (GHGs) which warm climate in the lower atmosphere and do not cause ozone depletion.

Influence of the Montreal Protocol. Montreal Protocol phase down schedules for each group of ODSs are based on several factors including (1) the effectiveness in depleting stratospheric ozone in comparison with other substances (see Ozone Depletion Potential, ODP, in Q17), ((2) the availability of suitable substitutes, and (3) the potential impact of controls on developing nations. The influence of Montreal Protocol provisions on stratospheric ODS abundances can be demonstrated with long-term changes in equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC).

Calculations of EESC combine the amounts of chlorine and bromine present in air near Earth's surface to form an estimate of the potential for ozone destruction in a particular stratospheric region on an annual basis (see definition in Q15). EESC values in the coming decades will be influenced by (1) the slow natural removal of ODSs present in the atmosphere, (2) emissions from continued production and use of ODSs, and (3) emissions from existing ODS banks. The phrase ODS banks refers to long-term containment of ODSs in various applications. Examples are CFCs in refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment as well as insulating foams, and halons in fire-extinguishing equipment. Annual emissions are projected based on release from existing banks and any new production and consumption of ODSs. The long-term changes in EESC at midlatitudes are shown in Figure Q14-1, based upon estimates of future emissions of ODSs that were published in year 2007 for the following cases:

  • No Protocol. In a world-avoided scenario without the Montreal Protocol, the production, use, and emissions of CFCs and other ODSs continue to increase unabated after 1987. This No Protocol scenario is illustrated using an annual growth rate of 3% for the emissions of all ODSs. As a result, EESC increases nearly 10-fold by the mid-2050s compared with the 1980 value. Computer models of the atmosphere show that EESC under the No Protocol scenario dramatically increases global total ozone depletion between 1990 and 2020 relative to what actually occurred, and increases ozone depletion much more by midcentury. As a result, harmful UV-B radiation would have roughly doubled at Earth's surface by the middle of the 21st century, causing damage to ecosystem health, and a global rise in skin cancer and cataract cases (see Q16). Since ODSs are powerful GHGs, the climate forcing from ODSs increases substantially without the Montreal Protocol (see Q18).

  • Montreal Protocol provisions. International compliance with only the 1987 provisions of the Montreal Protocol and the later 1990 London Amendment substantially slowed the projected growth of EESC relative to the world-avoided (No Protocol) scenario. The projections show a decrease in future EESC values for the first time with the 1992 Copenhagen Amendments and Adjustments. The provisions became more stringent with the amendments and adjustments adopted in Beijing in 1999 and Montreal in 1997 and 2007. Now, with full compliance to the Protocol, ODSs will ultimately be phased out, with some exemptions for critical uses (see Q15). Global EESC is slowly decaying from its peak value in 1998 and is expected to reach 1980 values around 2066. The success of the Montreal Protocol to date is demonstrated by the decline in ODP-weighted emissions of ODSs shown in Figure Q0-1. Total emissions peaked in 1987 at values about 10-fold higher than natural emissions from methyl chloride and methyl bromide (see Q15). Between 1987 and 2022, the emissions of ODSs from human activities decreased by almost 80%.

Figure Q14-1 also shows long-term changes in EESC for two additional cases from the 2022 Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion report:

  • Current trajectory. The current trajectory of EESC shown in Figure Q14-1 is based on observed abundances of ODSs from 2007 to 2021 and projected future abundances, assuming compliance with the Montreal Protocol. The current trajectory for EESC lies above the Montreal 2007 curve for two reasons: increased emissions of ODSs from banks as well as from feedstocks used for production of other chemicals, both relative to the assumptions of the original Montreal 2007 projection. The upward revision of the lifetime of CFC-11 and a few other ODSs since 2007, as well as unreported emissions of CFC-11, make small contributions to the slower decline of EESC than was projected in 2007.

  • Zero emissions. The zero emissions scenario demonstrates the reduction in EESC that occurs if emissions of all ODSs are set to zero beginning in 2023. This assumption eliminates the emissions from new production, feedstocks, and banks. Significant differences from the current trajectory are evident in the first decades following 2023 because the phaseout of all ODS production under the Protocol will not be complete in 2023 and continued bank emissions are substantial. In the zero-emissions scenario, EESC returns to the 1980 value about a decade earlier than currently projected (solid red and dashed black lines, Figure Q14-1).

HCFC substitute gases. The Montreal Protocol provides for the use of hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) as transitional, short- term substitute compounds for ODSs with higher ODPs, such as CFC-12. HCFCs are used for refrigeration, in making insulating foams, and as solvents, all of which were primary uses of CFCs. HCFCs are generally more reactive in the troposphere than other ODSs because they contain hydrogen (H) in addition to chlorine, fluorine, and carbon. Per amount emitted to the atmosphere, HCFCs are 88 to 98% less effective than CFC-11 in depleting stratospheric ozone because their chemical removal occurs primarily in the troposphere (see ODPs in Table Q6-1). The dominance of tropospheric removal for HCFCs prevents most of the halogen content this group of ODSs from reaching the stratosphere. In contrast, CFCs and some other ODSs release all their halogen content in the stratosphere because they are chemically inert in the troposphere (see Q5).

Under the provisions of the Montreal Protocol, developed and developing countries may continue to produce and import HCFCs over the rest of this decade before they are ultimately phased out. In the 2007 Adjustment to the Protocol, the phaseout of HCFCs was accelerated so that nearly all production ceased by 2020 for developed countries and ceases by 2030 for developing countries, about a decade earlier than in previous provisions. In making this decision, the Parties reduced the contribution of HCFC emissions to both long-term ozone depletion and future climate forcing (see Q17 and Q18).

HFC substitute gases. Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) are transitional substitute compounds for CFCs, HCFCs, and other ODSs. HFCs contain hydrogen, fluorine, and carbon. HFCs do not contribute to ozone depletion because they contain no chlorine or bromine. However, most HFCs and ODSs are also GHGs with long atmosphere lifetimes, so they contribute to human-induced climate change (see Q18 and Q19). Under the auspices of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), HFCs are included in the basket of GHGs for which regular reporting of national annual emissions are required. The Paris Agreement of the UNFCCC is an international accord designed to reduce the emissions of GHGs in order to limit global warming to well below 2.0°C relative to the start of the Industrial Era and pursue efforts to limit global warming to 1.5°C warming. Future growth in the production and consumption of HFCs with high GWPs is now limited by the 2016 Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol (see Q19).

Very short-lived chlorine source gases. VSL halogenated source gases, defined as compounds with atmospheric lifetimes typically shorter than 0.5 years, are primarily converted to reactive halogen gases in the lower atmosphere (troposphere). Atmospheric release of most very short-lived chlorine source gases, such as dichloromethane (CH2Cl2which is also known as methylene chloride) and chloroform (CHCl3), results primarily from human activities. This class of compounds is not controlled by the Montreal Protocol and therefore they are not included in the estimates of EESC shown in Figure Q14-1. The atmospheric abundance of VSL chlorine source gases has increased substantially since the early 1990s and these gases presently contribute about 4% (130 ppt) to the total chlorine entering the stratosphere (see Figure Q6-1). Furthermore, the fraction of VSL gases that reach the stratosphere varies as a function of the location where the gases are emitted into the atmosphere. Should this class of compounds ever come under the control of the Montreal Protocol, future actions would be effective at lowering atmospheric abundances rather quickly, because these compounds are removed from the atmosphere within a few years.

Yes, as a result of the Montreal Protocol, the overall abundance of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) in the atmosphere has been decreasing for the past two decades. If the nations of the world continue to comply with the provisions of the Montreal Protocol, the decrease will continue throughout the 21st century. Those gases that are still increasing in the atmosphere, HCFC-22 (CHF2Cl) and HCFC-141b (CH3CCl2F), will begin to decrease this decade if compliance with the Protocol continues. However, it is only after midcentury that the abundance of ODSs is expected to fall to values that were present before the Antarctic ozone hole was first observed in the early 1980s, due to the long atmospheric lifetime of these gases.

The Montreal Protocol and its amendments and adjustments have been very successful in reducing the atmospheric abundances of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs). ODSs are halogen source gases released by human activities whose production and consumption are now controlled by the Montreal Protocol (see Q14). The success of the Montreal Protocol controls is documented by (1) observed changes and future projections of the atmospheric abundances of the principal ODSs and (2) the long-term decrease in equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC).

Individual ODS reductions. The reduction in the atmospheric abundance of an ODS in response to controls on production and consumption depends principally on how rapidly this ODS is used and released to the atmosphere after being produced, as well as the atmospheric lifetime of the ODS (see Table Q6-1). For example, the abundances of ODSs with short lifetimes, such as methyl chloroform, respond quickly to emission reductions. In contrast, the abundances of ODSs with long lifetimes such as CFC-11 and CFC-12 respond slowly to emission reductions. Estimates of long-term changes in the atmospheric abundances of ODSs are based upon: (1) their measured abundances in air trapped for years within accumulated snow in polar regions, (2) observed atmospheric abundances using ground-based measurements, (3) projections of future abundances based on estimated future demand and compliance with Montreal Protocol provisions for the production and consumption of ODSs, and (4) emissions from ODS banks. The term bank refers to the total amounts of ODSs contained in existing equipment, chemical stockpiles, foams, and other products that have not yet been released to the atmosphere. The destruction of ODSs in banks prevents the eventual release of these compounds into the atmosphere. The long-term changes of the atmospheric abundances of individual ODSs and the natural chlorine and bromine source gases, methyl chloride (CH3Cl) and methyl bromide (CH3Br), assuming compliance with the Montreal Protocol, are shown in Figure Q15-1. Key aspects of families of ODSs shown in this figure are:

  • CFCs. Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) include some of the most destructive chlorine-containing ODSs. CFC-11 and CFC-12, with large Ozone Depletion Potentials (ODPs) of 1 and 0.75, are the most abundant CFCs in the atmosphere owing to large historical emissions and long atmospheric lifetimes of about 50 and 100 years, respectively (see Table Q6-1). Under the Montreal Protocol, allowed production and consumption of CFCs ended in January 1996 for developed countries and in January 2010 for developing countries. As a consequence, the atmospheric abundances of CFC-11 and CFC-113 peaked in 1994 and 1996, respectively, and have been declining for more than two decades. In contrast, the abundance of CFC-12 peaked in 2002 and has been slowly decreasing, owing to its longer lifetime (about 100 years) and continuing emissions from CFC-12 banks, namely, refrigeration and air conditioning equipment and thermal insulating foams. With no further global production of the principal CFCs, except for the use of certain CFCs (mainly CFC-113 and CFC-114) as feedstocks and some limited exempted uses, along with some continuing emissions from banks, CFC abundances are projected to decline steadily throughout this century. From 2012 to 2018, the annual decline in CFC-11 slowed measurably compared to the expected decline, due to unreported production outside the provisions of the Montreal Protocol. In 2019 and 2020, global emissions of CFC-11 declined in a manner indicative of the elimination of most of these unreported emissions.

  • Halons. Halons are currently the most important bromine-containing ODSs. Halon-1211 and halon-1301 account for a significant fraction of bromine from all ODSs (see Figure Q6-1). Under the Montreal Protocol, production and consumption of halons for controlled uses ended in January 1994 for developed countries and in January 2010 for developing countries, with some essential use exemptions for both developed and developing countries. Atmospheric abundances of halon-1211 show significant decreases since peak concentrations were measured in the mid-2000s. Halon-2402 abundances have been decreasing slowly for the past two decades while those of halon-1301 have nearly peaked and are expected to decline in coming decades. The slow decline in the emission of halon-1301 is likely due to substantial banks in fire-extinguishing and other equipment that gradually release this compound to the atmosphere years after production. The abundance of halon-1301 is expected to remain high well into the 21st century because of its long lifetime (72 years) and continued release. Atmospheric emissions of halons continue to occur due to the use of halon-containing equipment in various fire-fighting applications.

  • Carbon tetrachloride. Production and consumption of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) for controlled uses in developed countries was phased out in 1996 and that in developing countries in 2010, with some essential use exemptions. As a result, atmospheric abundances of carbon tetrachloride have been decreasing for two decades. The decline is considerably less rapid than expected, suggesting that actual emissions are larger than the emissions derived from the reported consumption. Carbon tetrachloride that is used as raw material (feedstock) to make other chemicals is exempted when calculating the controlled levels of production and consumption under the Montreal Protocol, and some residual emissions do occur. Current understanding of global sources suggests emissions of carbon tetrachloride are presently dominated by inadvertent production and subsequent release during the chemical manufacturing processes of other compounds, as well as release from landfills and contaminated soils.

  • Methyl chloroform. The largest reduction to date in the abundance of an ODS (99% from its peak value) has been observed for methyl chloroform (CH3CCl3). Production and consumption of methyl chloroform in developed countries ended in January 1996 and that in developing countries ended in January 2015, with limited essential use exemptions. Atmospheric abundances responded rapidly to the reduced emissions starting in the mid-1990s because methyl chloroform has a short atmospheric lifetime of about 5 years. Methyl chloroform was used mainly as a solvent and had typically been emitted soon after production. This compound is now approaching complete removal from the atmosphere due to the success of the Montreal Protocol.

  • HCFC substitute gases. The Montreal Protocol allows for the use of hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) as short-term, transitional substitutes for CFCs and in other specific applications. As a result, the atmospheric abundances of HCFC-22, HCFC-141b, and HCFC-142b continue to grow in response to continued production, mainly in the developing world. HCFCs pose a lesser threat to the ozone layer than CFCs, because HCFCs have lower ODP values (less than about 0.1; see Table Q6-1). The 2007 Montreal Adjustment to the Protocol accelerated the phaseout of HCFCs by a decade for both developed countries (2020) and developing countries (2030) (see Q14). Future projections indicate that the principal HCFCs will all reach peak values between 2023 and 2030, and steadily decrease thereafter. The response of atmospheric abundances to decreasing emissions (due to gradual releases from existing banks such as insulating foams) will be relatively rapid because of the short atmospheric lifetimes of HCFCs (less than 17 years).

  • Methyl chloride and methyl bromide. Both methyl chloride (CH3Cl) and methyl bromide (CH3Br) are distinct among halogen source gases because substantial fractions of their emissions are associated with natural processes (see Q6). Methyl chloride is not controlled under the Montreal Protocol. The abundance of CH3Cl in the atmosphere has remained fairly constant throughout the last 40 years (see Figure Q15-1). Current sources of methyl chloride from human activities are thought to be small relative to its natural source, and to be dominated by the combustion of coal and chemical manufacturing.

    In contrast, methyl bromide is controlled under the Montreal Protocol. Methyl bromide was primarily used as a fumigant. Nearly all developed country production and consumption of methyl bromide ended in January 2005 and that in developing countries ended in January 2015. The Protocol currently provides limited exemptions for methyl bromide production and use as a fumigant in agriculture as well as for quarantine and pre-shipment applications. Atmospheric abundances of methyl bromide declined rapidly in response to the reduced emissions starting in 1999, because its atmospheric lifetime is less than 1 year (see Figure Q15-1). Future projections show only small changes in methyl bromide abundances based on the assumptions of unchanged contributions from natural sources and small continued critical use exemptions. An important uncertainty in these projections is the future amount that will be produced and emitted under Montreal Protocol critical use, quarantine, and pre-shipment exemptions.

Equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC). Important measures of the success of the Montreal Protocol are the past and projected changes in the values of equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine, which was introduced in Figures Q13-1 and Q14-1. EESC is one measure of the potential for ozone depletion in the stratosphere that can be calculated from atmospheric surface abundances of ODSs and natural chlorine and bromine gases. The calculation considers CFCs, HCFCs, methyl chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, halons, as well as methyl chloride and methyl bromide. For both past and future EESC values, the required atmospheric abundances are derived from measurements, historical estimates, or future projections based on compliance with the provisions of the Montreal Protocol.

EESC is derived from the amount of chlorine and bromine available in the stratosphere to deplete ozone. The term equivalent indicates that bromine gases, scaled by their greater per-atom effectiveness in depleting ozone, are included in EESC. Although chlorine is much more abundant in the stratosphere than bromine (about 150-fold) (see Figure Q6-1), bromine atoms are about 60 times more efficient than chlorine atoms in chemically destroying ozone in the lower stratosphere. The term effective indicates that only the estimated fractions of ODSs that have been converted to reactive and reservoir halogen gases, for a particular region of the stratosphere at a specified time, are included in the computed value of EESC value (see Q5 and Q7). Long-term changes of EESC generally depend on the altitude and latitude region in the stratosphere under consideration. The EESC curve shown in Figure Q15-1 is for the midlatitude, lower stratosphere (about 19 km altitude).

Long-term changes in EESC. In the latter half of the 20th century up until the 1990s, EESC values steadily increased (see Figure Q15-1), causing global ozone depletion. As a result of the Montreal Protocol regulations, the long-term increase in EESC slowed, values reached a peak in 1999, and EESC then began to decrease. By 2022, EESC at midlatitudes had declined by about 18% from the peak value. The initial decrease came primarily from the substantial, rapid reductions in the atmospheric abundance of methyl chloroform, which has a lifetime of only 5 years. The decrease is continuing with declining abundances of CFCs, carbon tetrachloride, and halon-1211. Decreases depend on natural processes that gradually decompose and remove halogen- containing gases from the global atmosphere (see Q5). Reduction of EESC to 1980 values or lower will require four more decades because the most abundant ODS gases now in the atmosphere have lifetimes ranging from 10 to 100 year (see Table Q6-1).

Implications of ozone depletion and the Montreal Protocol

Yes, ultraviolet radiation at Earth's surface increases as the amount of overhead total ozone decreases because ozone absorbs ultraviolet radiation from the Sun. Measurements by ground-based instruments and estimates made using satellite data provide evidence that surface ultraviolet radiation has increased in large geographic regions in response to ozone depletion.

Depletion of stratospheric ozone leads to an increase in solar ultraviolet radiation at Earth's surface. The increase occurs primarily in the ultraviolet-B (UV-B) component of the Sun's radiation. UV-B is defined as radiation in the wavelength range of 280 to 315 nanometers, which is invisible to the human eye. Long-term changes in UV-B radiation reaching the surface have been measured directly and can be estimated from changes in total ozone (see Q3).

Exposure to UV-B radiation can harm humans, other life forms, and materials (see Q2). Most of the effects of sunlight on the human body are caused by UV-B radiation. A principal effect is sunburn, which first appears as reddening of the skin, also called erythema. Excess exposure to UV-B radiation can lead to skin cancer. Erythemal radiation is regularly reported to the public in many countries in the form of the UV Index (UVI), which is proportional to the erythemally weighted UV radiation at Earth's surface. The UVI ranges from zero at night to more than 20 at noon for high elevations in the tropics.

Surface UV-B radiation. The amount of UV-B radiation reaching Earth's surface at a particular location depends in large part on total column ozone (see Q3)in the atmosphere at that location. Ozone molecules in the stratosphere and in the troposphere absorb UV-B radiation, thereby significantly reducing the amount that reaches Earth's surface (see Q2). If conditions occur that reduce the abundance of ozone molecules somewhere in the troposphere or stratosphere, total ozone is reduced and the amount of UV-B radiation reaching Earth's surface is increased proportionately.

Additional causes of UV changes. The actual amount of UV-B radiation reaching Earth's surface at a specific location and time depends on a number of other factors, in addition to the amount of total ozone. The primary additional factor is the elevation of the Sun in the sky, which changes at any location with daily and seasonal cycles. Other factors include the altitude of the location, local cloudiness, the amount of ice or snow cover, and the amounts of atmospheric particles (aerosols) in the atmosphere above the location. Changes in clouds and aerosols are partially related to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from human activities. The seasonal change in the Earth-Sun distance is also a significant factor affecting the amount of UV-B radiation reaching the surface.

Measurements indicate that both increases and decreases in UV radiation at certain locations have resulted from variations in one or more of these factors. Estimating the impact of changes in these factors is complex. For example, an increase in cloud cover usually results in a reduction of UV radiation below the clouds and at the same time could increase UV radiation at a location in the mountains above the clouds. Conversely, if clouds don't sufficiently block the direct beam from the Sun, reflections from cloud particles can result in an increase in the amount of UV-B reaching the surface.

Biologically-weighted UV and the UV Index (UVI). The effect of ozone on the amount of biologically relevant UV that arrives at the Earth's surface is governed by the wavelength dependence of the biological action involved, which typically – as in the case for skin damage – increases towards shorter (higher energy) UV-B wavelengths. Effects are commonly reported in terms of the UVI. All else being equal, the UVI rises as the abundance of total ozone declines. This inverse relationship between total ozone and the UVI measured at surface locations at stations throughout the world is shown in Figure Q16-1. The observations show that a 50% decline in total ozone is associated with a factor of two increase in the UVI.

The UVI is used internationally to increase public awareness about the detrimental effects of UV on human health and to guide the need for personal protective measures. Largest values of the UVI occur in the tropics, where the midday Sun has the highest elevation throughout the year and total ozone values tend to be low (see Figure Q3-1). At all latitudes, the UVI is larger in mountainous areas (due to less overhead air to scatter or absorb the radiation) and over snow- or ice-covered regions (due to increased surface reflectivity). Values of the UVI greater than 10 are considered 'extreme': under this circumstance, damage to sensitive fair skin can occur within 15 minutes of exposure.

The expected variation of the UVI with respect to total ozone is shown by the line marked "Model" in Figure Q16-1, which is in excellent agreement with the observations. The sensitivity of UV-B to ozone change is similar to that for the UVI, whereas other biological weightings exhibit different sensitivities. For example, the sensitivity for damage to DNA as a function of total ozone is about twice as large as that for the UVI and UV-B, while the sensitivity for the production of Vitamin D in the skin is intermediate between those for DNA-damage and erythema.

Long-term surface UV changes. Changes in surface UV since the onset of ozone depletion are not well documented. Estimated changes derived from satellite measurements of ozone are incomplete because the backscattered radiation used by the satellites does not fully penetrate the lowermost portion of the atmosphere. Consequently, effects on UV radiation at Earth's surface due to interactions of sunlight with atmospheric aerosols and clouds must be estimated using computer models. Few ground-based measurements of UV radiation suitable for long term trend analysis were available prior to the early 1990s, during the period of most pronounced ozone depletion (see Q12). The start of the UV instrument record is further complicated by the volcanic eruption of Mount Pinatubo in 1991 (see Q13). Stratospheric aerosols from this eruption contributed to widespread ozone loss and also directly blocked solar radiation, including UV radiation, for more than a year.

The maximum daily UVI varies dramatically with location and season due largely to its strong dependence on solar elevation angle. Ground-based measurements since the early 1990s from the Palmer research station on the Antarctic Peninsula, the city of San Diego in southern California, and at Point Barrow near Utqiaġvik in northern Alaska enable a direct comparison between the UVI at polar and lower latitudes. The data show that the large geographical differences in the historical UVI have been dramatically affected by ozone depletion, especially at the Antarctic site, where the increases exceed historical geographic differences (see Figure Q16-2).

For San Diego and Point Barrow, the daily maximum UVI is largest during summer, when the midday Sun is closest to being overhead. For the Antarctic site, the daily maximum UVI now peaks in spring, the season of lowest total ozone due to the ozone hole (see Q10). The daily maximum UVI decreases significantly after mid-December due to the seasonal recovery of total ozone, following the break-up of the ozone hole (see Q10).

Prior to the development of the Antarctic ozone hole, the UVI was always much higher at San Diego (32°N) than at Palmer Station (64°S). Measurements at Palmer Station demonstrate the dramatic effect of Antarctic ozone depletion. There, estimates of the UVI for the years 1970 to 1976, a period before the appearance of the ozone hole, are compared with measurements for the period 1990-2020 when Antarctic ozone depletion increased the UVI throughout spring and into summer (orange shading). The development of the ozone hole led to large enhancements of the UVI that persist for many months, with the greatest increases occurring during spring.

The maximum UVI at Palmer Station is now larger by about a factor of 2.5 compared with the pre-ozone-hole period. The highest UVIs observed in spring now exceed those measured in spring and early summer in San Diego, despite San Diego's much lower latitude. The large levels of UV radiation reaching the surface due to the Antarctic ozone hole have had an adverse effect on the microscopic plants and animals at the base of the food chain in the high-latitude marine environment.

At San Diego, measurements of the UVI since 1992 and UVI values reconstructed based on pre-ozone depletion values are almost indistinguishable. This small change is consistent with the small variation in total ozone observed at subtropical latitudes (see Q12) and with the finding that the maximum daily UVI has remained essentially constant at these latitudes over about the past 20 years. At the Arctic site near Point Barrow, the UVI has increased by approximately 20% since the 1970s

Modeling UV changes. Despite the short data record, trends in the UVI measured at unpolluted sites since the early 1990s agree well with trends calculated from changes in total ozone. These measurements show that the change in the UVI from 1996 (around the time that stratospheric chlorine peaked, see Figure Q15-1 to 2020 have been small.

Model simulations of ozone in a world without the Montreal Protocol show that large increases in the UVI due to ozone depletion occur during the period 1996 to 2020. In these simulations, at mid-southern latitudes the UVI in summer increases by about 20%, and in springtime the UVI in Antarctica doubles without the Montreal Protocol. These illustrative estimates serve as a powerful testament to the benefit of the Montreal Protocol's role in protecting human health and the environment.

UV changes and human health. Over the past several decades, depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer together with societal changes in lifestyle have increased UV radiation exposure for many people. Increased UV exposure has adverse health effects, primarily associated with eye and skin disorders. UV radiation is a recognized risk factor for eye cataracts. For the skin, the most common threat is skin cancer. Over the past decades, the incidence of several types of skin tumors has risen significantly among people of all skin types. On the other hand, an important human health benefit of UV-B radiation exposure is the production of vitamin D, which plays a significant role in bone metabolism and the immune system. Human exposure to solar UV-B radiation requires a careful balance to maintain adequate levels of vitamin D, while minimizing the risks of skin and eye disorders.

Skin cancer in humans typically occurs long after exposure to UV radiation that causes sunburn. Even under the current provisions of the Montreal Protocol and its amendments and adjustments, projections of additional skin cancer cases associated with ozone depletion are largest in the first half of the 21st century. This projection represents a significant global health issue. Since recovery to 1980 values of total ozone averaged over 60°S to 60°N is projected to occur around the middle of this century (see Figure Q20-2), ozone depletion will continue to contribute to adverse human health effects over the coming decades.

In addition to detrimental effects on human health, increases in UV radiation reaching the surface also impact air quality, aquatic and terrestrial plants and ecosystems, biogeochemical cycling, and outdoor materials. The impacts of UV radiation are discussed in greater detail in reports by the Environmental Effects Assessment Panel (EEAP) of the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer.

No, ozone depletion is not the principal cause of global climate change. Ozone depletion and global climate change are linked because both ozone-depleting substances and their substitutes are greenhouse gases. The best estimate is that stratospheric ozone depletion has led to a small amount of surface cooling. Conversely, increases in tropospheric ozone and other greenhouse gases lead to surface warming. The effect on global climate change from stratospheric ozone depletion is small compared to the warming from the greenhouse gases responsible for observed global climate change. Since the early 1980s, the Antarctic ozone hole has contributed to changes in Southern Hemisphere surface climate through effects on the atmospheric circulation.

While stratospheric ozone depletion is not the principal cause of climate change, aspects of ozone depletion and climate change are closely linked. Both processes involve gases released to the atmosphere by human activities. The links are best understood by examining the contribution to climate change of the gases involved: ozone; ozone-depleting substances (or halogen source gases) and their substitutes; and other leading greenhouse gases.

Greenhouse gases and the radiative forcing of climate. The warming of Earth's surface and troposphere by the Sun is enhanced by the presence of greenhouse gases (GHGs). The natural abundances of GHGs in Earth's atmosphere absorb outgoing infrared radiation, trapping heat in the atmosphere and warming the surface. The most important natural GHG is water vapor. Without this natural greenhouse effect, Earth's surface would be much colder than current conditions. Human activities have led to significant increases in the atmospheric abundances of a number of long-lived and short-lived GHGs since 1750, the start of the Industrial Era, leading to warming of Earth's surface and associated climate changes. This group includes carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), tropospheric ozone, and halocarbons. Ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) and their substitutes make up a large fraction of the halocarbons in today's atmosphere. Increases in the abundances of these gases from human activities cause more outgoing infrared radiation to be absorbed and reemitted back to the surface, further warming the atmosphere and surface. This change in Earth's energy balance caused by human activities is called a radiative forcing of climate or, more simply, a climate forcing. The magnitude of this energy imbalance is usually evaluated at the top of the troposphere (tropopause) and is expressed using units of watts per square meter (W/m2). The potential for climate change rises as this radiative forcing increases.

A summary of radiative forcings of climate in 2019 resulting from the increases in the principal long-lived and short-lived GHGs from human activities since 1750 is shown in Figure Q17-1. Positive forcings lead to warming and negative forcings lead to cooling of Earth's surface. Climate forcings also lead to other changes, for example reductions in glacier and sea-ice extent, variations in precipitation patterns, and more extreme weather events. International climate assessments conclude that much of the observed surface warming and changes in other climate parameters over the last several decades are due to increases in the atmospheric abundances of CO2 and other GHGs, which result from a variety of human activities.

Carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide. All three of these GHGs have both human and natural sources. The accumulation of CO2 since 1750 represents the largest climate forcing caused by human activities. Carbon dioxide concentrations continue to increase in the atmosphere primarily as the result of burning fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas) for energy and transportation, as well as from cement manufacturing. The global mean atmospheric abundance of CO2 exceeded 416 parts per million (ppm) in 2021, which is about 50% larger than the abundance of CO2 present in 1750. Carbon dioxide is considered a long-lived gas, since a significant fraction remains in the atmosphere 100 to 1000 years after emission.

Methane is a short-lived climate gas (atmospheric lifetime of about 12 years). Sources related to human activities include livestock, fossil fuel extraction and use, rice agriculture, and landfills. Natural sources include wetlands, termites, and oceans. The global mean atmospheric abundance of CH4 has more than doubled since 1750.

Nitrous oxide is a long-lived climate gas (atmospheric lifetime of about 109 years). The largest source related to human activities is agriculture, especially the use of fertilizer. Microbial processes in soils that are part of natural biogeochemical cycles represent the largest natural source. In the stratosphere, nitrous oxide is the principal source of reactive nitrogen species that participate in ozone destruction cycles (see Q8). The global mean atmospheric abundance of nitrous oxide has increased by about 22% since 1750.

Halocarbons. Halocarbons in the atmosphere contribute to both ozone depletion and climate change. The halocarbons considered in Figures Q17-1 and Q17-2 are gases containing chlorine, bromine, or fluorine atoms that are either controlled under the Montreal Protocol or are GHGs that fall under the auspices of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Historically, ODSs were the only halocarbons controlled under the Montreal Protocol. In 2016, the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol established controls on the future production and consumption of certain hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) gases. Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) are in the UNFCCC group of GHGs that now fall under the Paris Agreement. Perfluorocarbons are compounds that contain only carbon and fluorine atoms, such as carbon tetrafluoride (CF4) and perfluoroethane (C2F6). Technically, SF6 is not a halocarbon since it lacks carbon. However, the environmental effects of SF6 are commonly examined with those of halocarbon gases since all of these compounds contain at least one halogen atom.

In 2019, the halocarbon contribution to the radiative forcing (RF) of climate was 0.41 W/m2, which is the fourth largest GHG forcing following carbon dioxide, methane, and tropospheric ozone (see Figure Q17-1). The contributions of individual halocarbon gases controlled by the Montreal Protocol are highlighted in Figure Q17-2. Within the halocarbons, CFC-12, CFC-11, and CFC-113 combined contribute the largest percentage (67%) to radiative forcing in 2019. The intermediate-term ODS substitutes, hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), make the next largest contribution (15%). The long-term ODS substitutes HFCs plus PFCs and SF6 contribute 13%. Finally, CCl4 and CH3CCl3 contribute an additional 3% and the minor CFCs and halons contribute 2% to radiative forcing in 2019.

The large contribution of the CFCs to radiative forcing has been gradually decreasing following the decline in their atmospheric abundance and is expected to further decrease (see Figure Q15-1). Based on their long lifetimes, CFCs will still make a significant contribution, and most likely the largest contribution from ODSs, to the radiative forcing by halocarbons at the end of this century. Even with adherence to the provisions of the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol, the radiative forcing from HFCs is projected to increase for another two to three decades before starting to slowly decline (see Figure Q19-2).

Stratospheric and tropospheric ozone. Ozone in both the stratosphere and the troposphere absorbs infrared radiation emitted from Earth's surface, trapping heat in the atmosphere. Ozone also significantly absorbs solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation. As a result, increases or decreases in stratospheric or tropospheric ozone induce a climate forcing and, therefore, represent direct links between ozone and climate. Air pollution from a variety of human activities has led to increases in global tropospheric ozone (see Q2), causing a positive radiative forcing (warming) estimated to be +0.47 W/m2 over the 1750-2019 time period, with a range of uncertainty spanning +0.24 to +0.70 W/m2 (see Figure Q17-1). The large uncertainty in the climate forcing due to release of air pollutants reflects our limited knowledge of changes in the abundance of tropospheric ozone between 1750 and the mid-1950s as well as the difficulty in modeling the complex chemical processes that control the production of tropospheric ozone.

On the other hand, rising abundances of ODSs in the atmosphere since the middle of the 20th century have led to decreases in stratospheric ozone, causing a negative radiative forcing of -0.02 W/m2 (cooling) over the 1750-2019 time period, with a range of uncertainty spanning -0.15 to +0.11 W/m2 (see Figure Q17-1). The sign of the radiative forcing due to stratospheric ozone depletion is uncertain because this quantity is the difference between two terms of comparable magnitude, each of which has an associated uncertainty. The first term represents the trapping by ozone of outgoing infrared radiation released by the surface and lower atmosphere: this is a cooling term because less ozone results in less trapping of heat. The second term represents the absorption of solar UV radiation by ozone: this is a warming term because less ozone results in greater penetration of solar UV radiation into the lower atmosphere (troposphere). This radiative forcing due to stratospheric ozone depletion will diminish in the coming decades, as ODSs are gradually removed from the atmosphere.

It is clear that stratospheric ozone depletion is not a principal cause of present-day global warming. First, the climate forcing from ozone depletion is small. Second, the total radiative forcing of climate from other GHGs such as carbon dioxide, methane, halocarbons, and nitrous oxide is large and positive, leading to warming Figure Q17-1. The total forcing from these other GHGs is the principal cause of the observed warming of Earth's surface.

Ozone Depletion Potentials and Global Warming Potentials. A useful way of comparing the influence of individual emissions of halocarbons on ozone depletion and climate change is to compare Ozone Depletion Potentials (ODPs) and Global Warming Potentials (GWPs). The ODP and GWP are the effectiveness of an emission of a gas in causing ozone depletion and climate forcing, respectively, relative to a reference gas (see Table Q6-1). The principal halocarbon gases are contrasted with each other in Figure Q17-3. The ODP of CFC-11 and the GWP of carbon dioxide are assigned reference values of 1. The CFCs and carbon tetrachloride all have ODPs near 1, indicating comparable effectiveness in causing ozone depletion per mass emitted. The principal halons have ODPs greater than 7, making them the most effective ozone-depleting substances per mass emitted. All HFCs have ODPs of zero since they contain no chlorine and bromine, and therefore do not directly cause ozone depletion (see Q6).

All halocarbons have non-zero GWPs and, therefore, contribute to the RF of climate. The GWP does not correspond strongly with the ODP of a gas because these quantities depend on different chemical and physical properties of the molecule. For example, while HFC-143a does not destroy ozone (ODP equals zero), each kilogram emitted is about 6000 times more effective than a kilogram of carbon dioxide in causing climate forcing. When HFCs are released to the atmosphere, their contribution to climate forcing depends on their GWPs, which vary over a wide range (less than 1 to 15,000).

Montreal Protocol regulations have led to reductions in CFC emissions and increases in HCFC emissions (see Q15). As a result of these actions, the total RF from ODSs stopped increasing and is now slowly decreasing because HCFCs have lower GWPs than CFCs (see Q18). However, the overall RF of all halocarbons is slowly increasing because of growing contributions from non-ODS gases (HFCs, PFCs, and SF6). The growth in the HFC contribution will be limited by the provisions of the 2016 Kigali Amendment (see Q19). It is important to note that despite having a GWP that is small in comparison to many other halocarbons and other greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide is the most important greenhouse gas produced by human activities because its emissions are large, its atmospheric lifetime is long, and its atmospheric abundance is far greater than those of all other greenhouse gases associated with human activities.

The Antarctic ozone hole and Southern Hemisphere climate. While stratospheric ozone depletion is not the principal cause of global climate change, the reoccurring Antarctic ozone hole has contributed to observed changes in climate parameters in the atmosphere and oceans of the Southern Hemisphere since the early 1980s. These research findings are explained in more detail in the box below.

Yes. Many ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) are also potent greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming when they accumulate in the atmosphere. Montreal Protocol controls have led to a substantial reduction in the emissions of ODSs over the last two decades. These reductions, while protecting the ozone layer, have the additional benefit of reducing the human contribution to climate change. Without Montreal Protocol controls, the global warming due to ODSs could now be nearly three times the present value. With the 2016 Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol, climate protection was extended to include controls on HFCs, which do not deplete ozone but contribute to global warming (see Q19).

The success of the Montreal Protocol in controlling the production and consumption of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) has protected the ozone layer (see Q14). The resulting reductions in emissions and atmospheric abundances of ODSs also decreased the human influence on climate because all ODSs are greenhouse gases (see Q17). By protecting both ozone and climate, the Montreal Protocol has provided a dual benefit to society and Earth's ecosystems. As shown in Figure Q18-1 and described below, the dual benefit of the Montreal Protocol is highlighted by considering long-term baseline and world-avoided scenarios of ODS emissions, Ozone Depletion Potentials (ODPs), Global Warming Potentials (GWPs), equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC), and the radiative forcing (RF) of climate.

Baseline ODS scenario. he baseline scenario refers to actual past ODS emissions of the principal halogen source gases and projected emissions for the years 2021 to 2025. The baseline scenario is labeled "from observed ODS abundances" in Figure Q18-1 since, for 1960-2020, the emissions are based upon analysis of observed abundances of the principal ODS gases at Earth's surface (see Figure Q15-1). This scenario also includes emissions of the naturally occurring halogen source gases methyl chloride (CH3Cl) and methyl bromide (CH3Br). For this scenario the peak emission of ODSs occurs in the late 1980s (see Figure Q0-1).

For all of the emission scenarios shown in Figure Q18-1, the annual emissions of each gas are added together after being weighted (multiplied) by their corresponding Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP) (upper left) or Global Warming Potential (GWP) (upper right) (see Q17 and Table Q6-1). The ODP and GWP of a given gas quantify how effective the gas is at destroying ozone (ODP) or warming climate (GWP) for the emission of a certain mass of the gas, relative to the effect on ozone or warming of the emission of the same mass of CFC-11 (for ODP) or CO2 (for GWP). In both cases, the reference gases (CFC-11 and CO2) are assigned a value of 1, and the ODP and GWP for all other gases are scaled accordingly (see Table Q6-1 and Q17). For example, 1 kg of halon-1211 emissions is expressed as 7.1 kg of CFC-11-equivalent emissions because the ODP of halon-1211 is 7.1. Similarly, the GWP-weighted sum is expressed as CO2-equivalent emissions because CO2 is the reference gas, with an assigned GWP of 1. Likewise, 1 kg of carbon tetrachloride emissions is considered to be 2150 kg of CO2-equivalent emissions because the GWP of carbon tetrachloride is 2150. GWP-100 values are shown here and throughout reflecting a choice of a time horizon of 100 years.

World-avoided ODS scenario. The baseline scenario of ODS emissions can be contrasted with a scenario of ODS emissions that the world has avoided by successfully implementing the Montreal Protocol (see Figure Q18-1). The world-avoided scenario is derived by assuming that, from 1987 onwards, emissions of ODSs increase at a rate of 3% per year. This growth rate is consistent with the strong market for ODSs in the late 1980s, which included a wide variety of current and potential applications and had the potential for substantial growth in developing countries.

CO2 emission scenario. Long-term emissions of CO2 are also shown in the upper right panel of Figure 18-1. Atmospheric CO2 is the principal greenhouse gas emitted by human activities. The CO2 emission curve represents global emissions from the sum of each nation's reported emissions from the combustion of coal, oil, natural gas, as well as the fuels used by the world's ships and airplanes, cement manufacturing, and the release of CO2 due to global de-forestation.

ODP-weighted emissions. The ODP-weighted emission scenario based upon observed ODS abundances is one measure of how the overall threat to stratospheric ozone from ODSs has changed over time (see Figure Q18-1, upper left panel). Since most ODSs remain in the atmosphere for years (see “Atmospheric lifetime” column in Table Q6-1), when ODP-weighted emissions rise this means there will be an increase in ozone destruction for many future years. Conversely, when emissions decline, less ozone will be destroyed in future years than if emissions had remained high. Annual ODP-weighted emissions increased substantially between 1960 and 1987, the year the Montreal Protocol was signed (see Figure Q0-1). After 1987, annual ODP-weighted emissions began a long and steady decline to present-day values. The decline in emissions is expected to continue, causing the atmospheric abundances of all individual ODSs to eventually decrease (see Figure Q15-1). The reductions in ODP-weighted emissions relative to the peak value in 1987 represent lower limits of the annual emissions avoided by the Montreal Protocol, which are a measure of its increasing success over time in protecting the ozone layer.

The upper limits of annual reductions in ODP-weighted emissions are derived from the world-avoided scenario. The difference between the world-avoided emission scenario and the baseline scenario (purple shaded region in Figure Q18-1, upper left panel) represents an estimate of the ozone layer protection provided by the Montreal Protocol.

GWP-weighted emissions. The GWP-weighted emission scenario based upon observed ODS abundances is a measure of how the overall threat to Earth's climate from ODSs has changed over time (see Figure Q18-1, upper right panel). As GWP-weighted emissions rise, the RF of climate in the future due to the accumulation of ODSs in the atmosphere also increases. The long-term changes in the GWP-weighted scenario are very similar to those in the ODP-weighted scenario. Both show an increase before 1987 and a decrease afterwards. This similarity follows from the dominant role that both CFC-11 and CFC-12 play in ozone depletion and climate forcing from ODSs. The difference between the world-avoided emission scenario and the baseline scenario (purple shaded region in Figure Q18-1, upper right panel) represents an estimate of the climate protection provided by the Montreal Protocol.

Annual GWP-weighted emissions of ODSs were a large percentage (about 20-40%) of global emissions of CO2 between 1960 and 1987. Thereafter, this percentage has steadily decreased and was 2-3% of global CO2 emissions in 2022. This past trend stands in sharp contrast to the world-avoided scenario, in which emissions of ODSs rise to more than 50% of CO2 emissions in 2022. Another way to understand the climate benefit of the Montreal Protocol is to compare the height of the purple shaded region in 2022 to the rise in the emissions of CO2 since 1987, as shown in Figure Q18-1 (upper right panel). These two quantities are nearly equal in magnitude, demonstrating that since 1987 the Montreal Protocol has avoided an increase in GWP-weighted emissions of ODSs that nearly equals the increase in global emissions of CO2 over this same time period.

EESC scenarios. The EESC scenarios in Figure Q18-1 (lower left panel) provide a measure of the year-to-year potential of the atmospheric abundances of ODSs to destroy stratospheric ozone. Two scenarios are shown: the baseline that uses observed abundances of ODSs (with a projection to 2025) and the world-avoided scenario described above. The derivation of EESC from ODS atmospheric abundances is discussed in Q15 and the same EESC baseline scenario is shown in Figures Q13-1, Q14-1 (red curve), and Q15-1 for different time intervals. When ODS- weighted emissions declined after 1987, EESC did not decrease in a proportional manner because of the long atmospheric lifetimes of the principal ODSs (see Table Q6-1). As shown in Figure Q18-1, EESC reached its peak value nearly a decade after the peak in ODP-weighted emissions, and by 2022 the decrease in EESC from its peak value was only about 18%, compared to the 80% decrease in ODP-weighted emissions achieved by 2022. Conversely, had the emissions of ODSs followed the world-avoided scenario, EESC would be more than twice the value in today's stratosphere. In this case, computer simulations show global total ozone values in 2020 are about 17% lower than the 1964-1980 average. Even larger depletions occur in subsequent years. The Montreal Protocol and its amendments and adjustments have provided vitally important protection to the global ozone layer and climate.

Radiative forcing scenarios. The RF of climate scenarios in Figure 18-1 (lower right panel) provide a measure of the year- to-year contribution to climate change from the atmospheric abundances of ODSs. The RF of an ODS is equal to the net increase in its atmospheric abundance since 1750 multiplied by its radiative efficiency, which quantifies how effective a given ODS molecule is at retaining infrared radiation. The RF of ODSs up to the present is calculated using observed atmospheric abundances. The RF due to ODSs increases smoothly from 1960 onward, peaks in 2010, and decreases very gradually in subsequent years. The decline of RF of climate in response to ODS emission reductions is slow because of the high abundances of the two principal contributing gases, CFC-11 and CFC-12, and their long atmospheric lifetimes of about 50 and 100 years, respectively.

Increasing the benefits of the Montreal Protocol.The benefit of the Montreal Protocol for protection of climate was expanded in 2016 through the Kigali Amendment, which placed controls on the production and consumption of some hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) (see Q19). HFC compounds do not contain chlorine or bromine, and therefore do not deplete ozone. Many HFC gases have a high radiative efficiency and a long atmosphere lifetime, which leads to significant global warming (see Figure Q19-2). The ozone layer and climate benefits of the Montreal Protocol could be further increased by expanded capture and destruction of halons, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) in banks, by avoiding emissions in continued use of ODSs as feedstock for the production of other chemicals, and by eliminating future emissions of halogen source gases not controlled by the Montreal Protocol, such as dichloromethane (CH2Cl2). Banks are largely associated with ODSs contained in refrigeration, air conditioning, fire protection equipment, insulating foams, and stockpiles for servicing long-term applications. Atmospheric release of ODSs from existing banks is projected to contribute more to ozone depletion in the coming decades than the limited production and consumption of ODSs (HCFCs and CH3Br) allowed by the Montreal Protocol after 2023. If all available options were implemented to avoid future atmospheric release of ODSs starting in 2023, the return of EESC to 1980 values would be advanced by about a decade for both the midlatitude (see Figure Q14-1) and polar stratosphere.

At the 28th Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol held in Kigali, Rwanda, in October 2016, the Montreal Protocol was amended to control the production and consumption of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). The Montreal Protocol phaseout of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) led to the temporary use of hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs). The subsequent phaseout of HCFCs led to expanded long-term use of HFCs, because HFCs pose no direct threat to the ozone layer. However, HFCs are greenhouse gases and therefore contribute to climate change. Limiting the production and consumption of those HFCs with high global warming potentials is projected to avoid 0.3 to 0.5°C of global warming over this century. The Kigali Amendment marks the first time the Montreal Protocol has adopted regulations solely for the protection of climate.

The control of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) by the Montreal Protocol provides the dual benefit of protecting Earth's ozone layer and global climate (see Q18). The widespread global use of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and their projected future growth in the coming decades has been recognized by the Montreal Protocol as a potentially significant contribution to climate change from human activities. In response, the Kigali Amendment was adopted to control production and consumption of HFCs with high Global Warming Potentials (GWPs) (see Q17). Full compliance with the provisions of the Kigali Amendment will significantly enhance the climate-protection benefit of the Montreal Protocol.

Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). HFCs are replacement compounds for ODSs that were chosen because they contain no chlorine or bromine that cause ozone depletion. HFCs are widely used in the residential air-conditioning and refrigeration sectors and as foam-blowing agents, spray-can propellants, and feedstocks for the production of other chemicals. These uses are growing as the global phaseout of hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), the early replacement compounds, nears completion. The GWPs of HFCs vary over a wide range due to differences in their physical and radiative properties (see Table Q6-1 and Figure Q17-3). For example, the GWP of HFC-134a (primarily used in air conditioning and refrigeration) is 1470, which means that after release to the atmosphere, each kilogram of HFC-134a is 1470 times more effective than a kilogram of CO2 in increasing climate forcing over a century-long time period. In contrast, the GWP of HFO-1234yf, a substitute for HFC-134a, is less than 1.

HFC-23. HFC-23 is considered separately in the Kigali Amendment because this gas is primarily produced as an unwanted byproduct in the manufacture of HCFC-22 and HFCs. The global warming potential of HFC-23 is quite large (14,700), in part due to its long atmospheric lifetime of 228 years. Although many methods exist to chemically destroy HFC-23 at production facilities, this compound continues to be released to the atmosphere. For example, the atmospheric abundance of HFC-23 increased by 44% between 2009 and 2019. In 2019, the radiative forcing of HFC-23 was 0.006 W/m2, which is approximately 15% of the total forcing from all HFCs. The Kigali Amendment phases down, in conjunction with the other HFCs, unwanted by-production of HFC-23, but provides no specific control measures for emissions of HFC-23. Instead, the amendment directs nations to destroy HFC-23 to the extent practicable in order to avoid future emissions and the associated increased climate forcing.

Climate implications of HFC use. The total global emission of HFCs expressed in terms of CO2-equivalent emissions has grown steadily since 2000, equaling about 1 gigatonne CO2-equivalent per year in 2020 (see Figure Q19-1). The primary emissions of HFCs are of HFC-134a as well as HFC-143a, HFC-125 and HFC-32, which are widely used in blended refrigerants such as R404A (52% HFC-143a, 44% HFC-125, and 4% HFC-134a) and R410A (50% HFC-32, 50% HFC-125). Recent growth in the consumption (and emissions) of HFCs is due in part to replacing HCFCs that are being phased out under the Montreal Protocol with HFCs. In 2019, the atmospheric abundances of HFCs contributed about 10% of climate forcing from all halocarbon compounds (see Figure Q17-2) and less than 1% of the total climate forcing from all other long-lived greenhouse gases (see Figure Q17-1). Projections based on current production and consumption patterns and future economic growth indicate that, without the Kigali Amendment, HFC emissions could have reached around 5 gigatonnes CO2-equivalent per year by 2050 and nearly double that value by 2100 (see Figure Q19-1). This projected emission value for 2050 is about one half of the peak in CO2-equivalent emissions of ODSs in 1987 (see Figure Q18-1). Thus, in the absence of the Kigali Amendment, the projected growth in HFC emissions in the coming decades offsets a significant amount of the climate protection gained from reductions in ODS emissions under the Montreal Protocol.

Kigali Amendment. The future of HFC emissions was changed by the Montreal Protocol with the adoption of the Kigali Amendment in 2016. The amendment requires a phasedown of the global production and consumption of high-GWP HFCs by more than 80% (in CO2-equivalent) from the baseline level over the next 30 years. The phasedown schedule accommodates the concerns and interests of developed and developing countries, including those with high ambient temperatures that are likely going to have future increased demand for the use of air-conditioners. The Kigali Amendment entered into force on 1 January 2019. Figure Q19-1 shows how the amendment provisions dramatically reduce projected emissions of HFCs in the coming decades. The emissions of HFCs that are avoided by 2100 total about 420 gigatonnes CO2-equivalent, which is more than 10 years of present-day annual emissions of CO2 due to human activities.

Expanding climate protection. The Kigali Amendment substantially expands the protection of climate afforded by the Montreal Protocol (see Q18). With full implementation of the amendment, annual global emissions of HFCs reach their peak value before 2040 (see Figure Q19-1). Without the amendment, yearly emissions are projected to increase until market saturation is reached in the second half of the century, at a value of about 10 gigatonnes CO2-equivalent per year, nearly five times more than the emission peak under the amendment. Furthermore, as shown in Figure Q19-2, the long-term radiative forcing of climate, which is proportional to atmospheric abundances, is substantially reduced. Without the amendment, projected radiative forcing from HFCs increases throughout this century, reaching a value of about 0.6 W/m2 in 2100. In this scenario, radiative forcing due to HFCs by the end of the century exceeds that of nitrous oxide and rivals that of methane. With the amendment, the radiative forcing of climate by HFCs reaches a peak value before 2050 and gradually decreases to about 0.07 W/m2 in 2100. The ranges of climate forcing values for methane and nitrous oxide in 2100 as shown in Figure Q19-2 far exceed the 0.07 W/m2 forcing due to HFCs under the Kigali Amendment.

The benefit of avoiding HFC radiative forcing over many decades as a result of the Kigali Amendment provisions can be expressed as an avoided increase in globally averaged surface temperature. The increase in temperature by the year 2100 due to future atmospheric growth of HFCs without the Kigali Amendment and national regulations is projected to be between 0.3 and 0.5°C (see Figure Q19-2). In contrast, the temperature increase is projected to be about 0.06°C with full implementation of the amendment, which is significantly less, for example, than the warming expected from projected abundances of methane and nitrous oxide in 2100. Currently, global warming due to all emissions from human activities is about 1.2°C since 1750, the start of the Industrial Era. The goal of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Paris Agreement is to limit global warming to well below 2.0°C since the start of the Industrial Era and to pursue efforts to limit global warming to 1.5°C. The temperature increase of 0.3 to 0.5°C avoided by the Kigali Amendment contributes substantially to the achievability of this goal.

Low-GWP substances. The Kigali Amendment encourages the use of low-GWP substances or other alternatives to replace high-GWP HFCs in the coming decades (see Table Q6-1 and Figure Q17-3). Other alternatives include propane, ammonia, and other climate-friendly technologies. The low-GWP substances include a subset of HFCs known as hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs), which are also composed only of hydrogen, fluorine and carbon atoms. The chemical structure of HFOs includes a double carbon bond, causing these compounds to be more reactive in the lower atmosphere (troposphere) than other HFCs. Consequently, HFOs have very short atmospheric lifetimes. One such compound, HFO-1234yf, has a lifetime of only 12 days, in contrast to HFC-23, HFC-143a, and HFC-134a with lifetimes of 228, 52, and 14 years, respectively (see Table Q6-1). The short atmospheric lifetimes of HFOs lead to very low GWPs. As a result, the emission of an HFO results in substantially lower climate forcing than the forcing caused by emission of the same mass of high-GWP HFCs (see Figure Q19-1).

The projections of emissions under the Kigali Amendment include a group of compounds labeled Low-GWP Alternatives in Figure Figure Q19-1. These compounds are expected to cover the application demand from sectors in which the use of high-GWP HFCs is phased down. Even with the emissions of a large mass of these low-GWP alternatives, the future projected contribution to climate change is much less than contributions from projected emissions of high-GWP HFCs in the absence of the Kigali Amendment.

Other environmental consequences of HFC use. The atmospheric abundance of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA, chemical formula C2HF3O2) is expected to increase in the coming decades due to future emissions of HFCs (including HFOs), HCFCs, and related compounds. When these compounds breakdown in the atmosphere, they produce TFA, a persistent, long-lived chemical with potentially harmful effects on animals, plants, and humans. The current concentration of TFA in rainwater and ocean water is generally very far below toxicity limits. Potential future environmental impacts of TFA are a subject of active research.

The Future. The phasedown of HFCs under the Kigali Amendment sets a path in which HFCs play a very limited role in future climate forcing. Achieving the maximum climate protection from the implementation of the amendment requires that compounds replacing high-GWP HFCs have much smaller or negligible GWPs. Technological developments related to low-GWP replacement substances or other alternatives along with improved refrigeration and air conditioning equipment will help achieve this maximum protection. The release of greenhouse gases in generating electricity for powering refrigeration and air conditioning equipment contributes to the indirect climate forcing from this sector. Improvements in the energy efficiency of equipment in this sector during the transition to low-GWP alternative refrigerants could potentially double the direct climate benefits of the Kigali Amendment. The combination of low-GWP replacement compounds, energy efficiency improvements, and the growth in renewable energy sources has great potential to minimize the direct and indirect contributions to climate forcing from global refrigeration and air conditioning applications.

Stratospheric ozone in the future

Recovery of the global ozone layer from the effects of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) is expected around the middle of the 21st century, assuming global compliance with the Montreal Protocol. Recovery will occur as ODSs and reactive halogen gas abundances in the stratosphere decrease in the coming decades. In addition to responding to ODSs, ozone abundances will increasingly be influenced by climate change. The impacts of future climate change on the ozone layer will vary between the tropics, midlatitudes, and polar regions, and strongly depend on future emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). During the long recovery period, large volcanic eruptions could temporarily reduce global ozone amounts for several years.

The expected recovery of the global and polar ozone layer is a direct consequence of the success of the Montreal Protocol in reducing the global production and consumption of ODSs. Currently, the atmospheric abundances of most major ODSs and the associated annual values of equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC) are in decline (see Q15). In contrast to the diminishing role of ODSs, changes in climate are expected to have an increasing influence on future levels of total ozone. Climate change is driven by the projected growth in the abundance of greenhouse gases (GHGs), primarily carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). Increasing amounts of GHGs will lead to changes in temperature, chemistry, and the circulation of the stratosphere, all of which affect ozone. Chemistry-climate models can be used to project how ozone is expected to respond to changes in ODSs and climate in particular geographic regions during the recovery period. Sporadic events such as major volcanic eruptions and wildfires, or deliberate actions such as the injection of aerosols into the stratosphere to mitigate global warming may also influence future ozone levels.

Using chemistry-climate models. Chemistry-climate models (CCMs) are complex computer programs that simulate temperature, winds, radiation, and the chemical composition of the atmosphere, including stratospheric ozone. The simulations of ozone are conducted as a function of time, altitude, and geographic location. Projections of total ozone presented here are based on the results from a group of chemistry-climate models that account for the influences of changes in ODSs and GHGs. These models show how changes in ozone are expected to vary across geographic regions by evaluating the complex interactions of the processes that control ozone and climate involving radiation, chemistry, and transport of chemicals by stratospheric winds. Model inputs include historical and projected concentrations of ODSs, GHGs (including CO2, CH4, and N2O, air pollutant gases, as well as incoming solar radiation. The results from chemistry-climate model simulations are used to identify particular processes that are important for future abundances of ozone. For example, model projections driven by increases in the atmospheric abundance of GHGs over the coming decades show a strengthening in the global-scale atmospheric circulation that brings air from the troposphere into the stratosphere in the tropics, moves stratospheric air poleward into both hemispheres, and then returns air to the troposphere at middle to high latitudes. These circulation changes will significantly alter the global distribution of ozone and the atmospheric lifetimes of ODSs and other long-lived gases (see Q6). Also, while Earth's surface is expected to continue to warm in response to positive radiative forcing of climate from GHGs (see Q17), the stratosphere is expected to continue to cool. A colder upper stratosphere leads to increases in ozone because lower temperatures slow down the gas-phase reactions responsible for ozone loss. Conversely, colder conditions at lower altitudes in the polar stratosphere have the potential to exacerbate ozone loss, especially if the presence of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) increases.

Methane and nitrous oxide are both involved in the chemistry that determines levels of stratospheric ozone. The main effect of higher amounts of CH4 is to increase ozone, while that of rising N2O is to decrease ozone. The stratospheric decomposition of CH4 leads to more reactive hydrogen gases that produce ozone in the lowest parts of the stratosphere and increases the conversion of reactive chlorine into its reservoir gas HCl (see Q7). The decomposition of CH4 also leads to larger abundances of H2O, which cool the upper stratosphere, slowing down ozone loss reactions. Conversely, the decomposition of N2O produces reactive nitrogen gases that destroy ozone (see Q8). The effect of higher amounts of N2O on the depletion of the ozone layer becomes increasingly important as halogen levels decline.

Simulating recent ozone changes. Comparisons of model results with observations help confirm the causes of ozone depletion and increase confidence in model projections of future ozone amounts. Two important measures are the globally averaged total column ozone outside of polar regions (see Q3) and total ozone in the Antarctic during October (the month of peak ozone depletion). These observations are compared to simulations from a group of chemistry-climate models in Figure Q20-1. Both time series of ozone show substantial depletion since 1980. The average model values of ozone follow the observed general decline in both regions, suggesting that the main processes involved in ozone depletion are well represented by these models.

There are significant year-to-year variations in global and Antarctic ozone that are not captured by these simulations. The differences between the observed and modeled values of ozone are due to factors such as interannual meteorological variability that are not well represented in these simulations. Over the time period 1996-2020, observed global ozone has exhibited considerable variability and risen slightly, by less than 1% (see Q12). Antarctic ozone during October has exhibited even more year-to-year variability, but there are emerging indications that the ozone hole has diminished in size and depth (maximum amount of ozone depletion) since 2000, particularly during September when the effects of meteorological variability are smaller (see Q10).

Long-term total ozone projections. Total ozone changes derived from chemistry-climate models are shown for 1960 to 2100 in Figure Q20-1. These simulations use the projected abundances of ODSs given in the 2018 Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion report. A computation of EESC (see Q15) based on this 2018 projection of ODSs shows a return to the 1980 level in years 2061 and 2077 for the midlatitude and polar stratospheres, respectively.

The model simulations shown in Figure Q20-1 use projections of CO2, CH4, and N2O termed the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). Each SSP provides an estimate of future abundances of GHGs based on projected emissions, which are constructed using various assumptions of population growth and economic development, as well as technological innovation and political decisions related to the environment. Figure Q20-1 shows the evolution of annually averaged ozone outside the polar regions (60°S-60°N) (top) and ozone during October at 70°S-90°S (bottom), for a high climate forcing scenario (SSP3-7.0; purple line), a medium scenario (SSP2-4.5; dark orange line), and a low scenario (SSP1-2.6; blue line). These three lines represent the multi-model mean (MMM) projection from numerous CCMs.

These simulations show that the future recovery of the ozone layer outside of the polar regions will be governed mostly by GHGs, assuming continued adherence to the Montreal Protocol. The wide range of possible future levels of CO2, CH4, and N2O is an important limitation to providing accurate future projections of ozone globally and for the ozone hole (Figure Q20-1), as well as in other geographic regions. For 60°S-60°N, total ozone recovers to the 1980 level more rapidly under the high climate forcing scenario because large future increases in both CO2 and CH4 tend to increase ozone. Under the low climate forcing scenario, the MMM of the CCMs projects that ozone over 60°S-60°N may not reach the 1980 level by the end of this century. In this low climate forcing simulation, future declines in total ozone driven by rising N2O outweigh the small future ozone increases caused by CO2 and CH4. For the MMM of the medium climate forcing scenario (dark orange line in Figure Q20-1), total ozone over 60°S-60°N is projected to return to the 1980 level around year 2040.

The one-standard deviation range of computed values of ozone from these CCMs for all three scenarios is shown by the orange shaded region in Figure Q20-1 (see caption), which depicts the uncertainty in the model projections of ozone for both regions. There is a considerable range of model projections for total ozone at the end of the century for 60°S-60°N, because of sensitivity to the actual future abundance of GHGs for the three scenarios considered here, as well as variations among CCMs regarding how the stratospheric circulation will actually respond to a specific GHG scenario. The CCM simulations in Figure Q20-1 show that for the Antarctic ozone hole (October, 70°S-90°S) the future evolution of total ozone is largely governed by ODSs, with modest sensitivity to GHGs. Here, total ozone is projected to return to the 1980 level in 2066 for both the low and medium climate forcing scenarios (blue and dark orange lines, Figure Q20-1). Under the high climate forcing scenario, a more rapid recovery of October total ozone for 70°S-90°S is projected, with a return to the 1980 level at mid-century. Because of the impact of GHGs, these recovery years for the return of Antarctic total ozone to the 1980 level precede 2078, which is the year EESC is projected to return to its 1980 level for the polar stratosphere.

The multi-model mean of CCM simulations conducted for Northern Hemisphere (NH) midlatitudes (35°N-60°N) and Southern Hemisphere (SH) midlatitudes (35°S-60°S) (results not shown) project a return of total ozone to the 1980 level around years 2035 and 2045, respectively, for the medium climate forcing scenario. The faster return of total ozone to the 1980 level forecast for NH midlatitudes under this scenario is caused by a greater sensitivity of ozone to future abundances of GHGs in the NH compared to the SH, as explained below. The return to the 1980 level of total ozone for both NH and SH midlatitudes occurs considerably sooner than year 2061, when EESC is projected to return to the 1980 level. Finally, the MMM of CCM simulations for the tropics (20°S-20°N) (results not shown) under the medium climate forcing scenario indicates that total ozone will remain below the 1980 level until the end of this century.

Figure Q20-2 illustrates, for six geographic regions, the combined effect on ozone of future changes in ODSs, the GHGs CO2, CH4, and N2O (white line marked “Sum of all gases”) as well as the individual effect on ozone of each GHG and all ODSs. These effects on ozone are determined by varying the abundance of each quantity individually, while holding the abundances of the others constant at their level in 1960. All of the results shown in Figure Q20-2 are for the medium climate forcing SSP2-4.5 scenario and rely on simulations from a single CCM. As such, the timing of the recovery of ozone to the 1980 level differs slightly from the values stated above, which are based on the MMM of simulations from numerous CCMs. In Figure Q20-2 the change of ozone is shown relative to the 1960 level to more clearly display the results prior to 1980.

The breakdown of individual drivers of future ozone for these six selected regions shown in Figure Q20-2 is an illustrative example of the complexity of projecting the future recovery of stratospheric ozone, as the sensitivity to various factors differs markedly between regions.

Future changes in total ozone for the various regions are described with respect to a return to the level in year 1960 (see figure caption):

  • Antarctic. Total ozone changes are largest in the Antarctic region in springtime (October). Chemistry-climate models show that ODSs are the predominant factor in Antarctic ozone depletion in the past and in the coming decades. The future increase of CO2 and CH4 in this scenario acts to increase ozone, while the future increase in N2O decreases ozone. All of these impacts on ozone are smaller than the present impact of ODSs, and the effects of CO2, CH4, and N2O nearly cancel one another later in the century. As a result, changes in total ozone when all forcings are considered (white line) mostly follow the change driven by ODSs (dark pink shaded region). Although meteorological variability in the Antarctic in late winter/early spring when ozone depletion occurs causes a substantial range in the observations and model projections (see Figure Q20-1), Antarctic total ozone is projected to remain below the 1960 level throughout the rest of this century.

  • Arctic. Total ozone changes in the Arctic during spring (March) are considerably smaller than in the Antarctic (see Q11). After midcentury, Arctic total ozone increases to values above those expected from future reductions in ODSs alone because of the strengthening of atmospheric circulation and enhanced stratospheric cooling associated with increases in GHGs such as CO2. For this medium climate forcing scenario, Arctic spring total ozone is projected to exceed the 1960 level after around 2065.

  • Northern and southern midlatitudes. Changes in the annual averages of total ozone in midlatitudes are much smaller than the springtime losses in polar regions. In the northern midlatitudes, the all-forcings simulation (white line) indicates a return of total ozone to the 1960 value around 2045, even though EESC remains above its 1960 value until the end of the century. In the southern midlatitudes, total ozone returns to the 1960 level around 2085, about four decades later than projected for the Northern Hemisphere. The maximum ozone depletion near year 2000 is much larger for the Southern Hemisphere, and total ozone more closely follows the depletion driven by ODSs. This behavior reflects the influence of the Antarctic ozone hole on the southern midlatitudes, driven by the transport of ozone-depleted air following the breakup of the polar vortex in late spring (see Q10). The larger value of midlatitude total ozone from mid-century to the end of this century when all forcings are considered (white lines) compared to ozone depletion due only to ODSs (dark pink shaded region) reflects the influence of changes in stratospheric circulation and upper stratospheric temperatures by CO2 and CH4 for this medium climate forcing scenario, especially in the NH.

  • Tropics. Total ozone changes in the tropics are smaller than in any other region. Ozone is less sensitive to ODSs in the tropical stratosphere because of the dominant roles of production and transport in controlling ozone and the low amounts of reactive halogens available in this region (see Q12). Total ozone gradually increases until around 2060, and then remains fairly constant and slightly below the 1960 level until the end of the century. The near-constant value of tropical ozone during the latter part of the century is primarily due to climate-change-induced strengthening of the stratospheric circulation, which leads to enhanced transport of ozone out of the tropics and into midlatitudes. This circulation change also influences the Arctic and midlatitude regions, as noted above.

  • The globe. The annual average of global (60°S to 60°N) otal ozone is projected to return to the 1960 level around 2075, even though EESC remains above its 1960 value until the end of the century. Chemistry-climate model analysis suggests that the early return of total ozone relative to EESC, as well as the end-of-century rise, are primarily a result of upper stratospheric cooling and strengthening of the stratospheric circulation caused by increasing GHGs. Towards the latter part of this century, increased abundances of N2O may lead to more ozone depletion (dark blue shaded region) than ODSs (dark pink shaded region).

Future ultraviolet radiation. Projections of long-term changes in total ozone can be used to estimate long-term changes in solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation reaching Earth's surface (see Q16). The UV-B component of ultraviolet radiation (see Q2) decreases as total ozone increases. Based on the ozone increases in the chemistry-climate model projections, clear-sky (cloud-free) UV-B radiation is expected to be below the 1960 value by the end of the century across much of the globe in regions that are not currently affected by high levels of tropospheric air pollution. Clear-sky UV-B radiation values are expected to remain high in Antarctica, where total ozone is expected to remain below its 1960 value even at the end of this century.

Volcanoes, wildfires, and climate intervention. There are several factors not included in chemistry-climate model projections shown above that have the potential to affect future amounts of total ozone. For example, explosive volcanic eruptions have temporarily reduced global total ozone in the past (see Q13) by enhancing the stratospheric sulfate aerosol layer. Large volcanic eruptions that occur while EESC values remain high are expected to reduce total ozone for a few years. Such volcanic eruptions are an additional source of uncertainty that is not included in the ozone projections in Figures Q20-1 and Q20-2. Extreme wildfires can generate deep thunderstorms, termed pyrocumulonimbus (pyroCb) clouds, that inject particles from biomass burning into the stratosphere. The biomass burning particles consist of organic carbon, inorganic components and a significant fraction of black carbon that enhance the absorption of solar radiation. These pyroCb particles likely impact the ozone layer and climate in a manner that differs substantially from the impact of sulfate aerosols.

Numerous climate intervention (also called geoengineering) methods have been proposed to reduce climate forcing from human activities. A widely discussed method is the intentional enhancement of sulfate aerosols in the stratosphere from direct injections of sulfur-containing substances, known as Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI). With sufficient enhancement, the added aerosols would cool the Earth's surface through increased reflection of sunlight back to space, similar to the effect observed after volcanic eruptions that inject sulfate into the stratosphere (see Figure Q13-1). While SAI could reduce some of the impacts of global warming, it cannot restore past climatic conditions and may cause unintended side effects, including changes in the concentration of stratospheric ozone, a delay in the recovery of the ozone hole, and changes to the atmospheric circulation. Aerosol heating of the lowermost stratosphere by SAI using sulfates could result in further residual impacts, including changes in regional surface temperature and precipitation patterns. How much aerosol injection would be needed and the duration of that injection would depend on the desired climate outcomes and the trajectory of greenhouse gas emissions and decarbonization efforts. The sign of stratospheric ozone changes will depend on the details of the SAI implementation as well as the concentrations of EESC and N2O at the time of injection. Changes in stratospheric water vapor due to variations in temperature and circulation resulting from SAI may also play a role in governing how stratospheric ozone would be affected by SAI.

Studies are currently being conducted to determine materials for SAI other than sulfate that have chemical and radiative properties that would reduce the effect of SAI on ozone and stratospheric heating. These studies are just beginning; significant laboratory and modeling work on materials other than sulfate is needed before their effects on ozone and stratospheric transport can be reliably estimated.


CCMchemistry-climate model
CFCchlorofluorocarbon, a group of industrial compounds that contains at least one chlorine, fluorine, and carbon atom
CFC-11-equivalenta unit for the measure of the mass of emission of an ODS, equal to the product of the actual mass emission of the ODS times its ODP
CO2-equivalenta unit for the measure of the mass of emission of a GHG, equal to the product of the actual mass emission of the GHG times its GWP
DUDobson unit, a measure of total column ozone; 1 DU = 2.687 ×1016 molecules/cm2
EEAPEnvironmental Effects Assessment Panel of the Montreal Protocol
EESCequivalent effective stratospheric chlorine, a measure of the total amount of reactive chlorine and bromine gases in the stratosphere that is available to deplete stratospheric ozone
GHGgreenhouse gas
gigatonne 1 billion (109) metric tons = 1 trillion (1012) kilograms
GWPglobal warming potential, a measure of the effectiveness of the emission of a gas to cause an increase in the radiative forcing of climate, relative to the radiative forcing caused by the emission of the same mass of CO2; all GWPs used here are for a 100-year time interval
halogenelements fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine, and astatine that form group 7A of the periodic table
halona group of industrial compounds that contain at least one bromine and carbon atom; may or may not contain a chlorine atom
HCFChydrochlorofluorocarbon, a group of industrial compounds that contain at least one hydrogen, chlorine, fluorine, and carbon atom
HFChydrofluorocarbon, a group of industrial compounds that contain at least one hydrogen, fluorine, and carbon atom and no chlorine or bromine atoms
HFOhydrofluoroolefin, a group of industrial compounds that contain at least one hydrogen, fluorine, and carbon atom and no chlorine or bromine atoms, and also include a double carbon bond that causes these gases to be more reactive in the troposphere than other HFCs
IPCCIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
kilotonne1000 metric tons = 1 million (106) kilograms
megatonne1 million (106) metric tons = 1 billion (109) kilograms
MMMmulti-model mean
mPamillipascal; 100 million mPa = atmospheric sea-level pressure
nmnanometer, one billionth of a meter (10-9 m)
ODPozone-depletion potential, a measure of the effectiveness of the emission of a gas to deplete the ozone layer, relative to the ozone depletion caused by the emission of the same mass of CFC-11
ODSozone-depleting substance
ozone layerthe region in the stratosphere with the highest concentration of ozone, between about 15 and 35 km altitude
ppbparts per billion; 1 part per billion equals the presence of one molecule of a gas per billion (109) total air molecules
ppmparts per million; 1 part per million equals the presence of one molecule of a gas per million (106) total air molecules
pptparts per trillion; 1 part per trillion equals the presence of one molecule of a gas per trillion (1012) total air molecules
PFCperfluorocarbon, a group of industrial compounds that contain only carbon and fluorine atoms
PSCpolar stratospheric cloud
RFradiative forcing of climate
SAIstratospheric aerosol injection
SAODstratospheric aerosol optical depth
source gasa halogen-containing chemical with a sufficiently long atmospheric lifetime that its emissions contribute to the stratospheric abundance of chlorine or bromine molecules, which participate in chemical reactions that deplete ozone
SAPScientific Assessment Panel of the Montreal Protocol
SSPShared Socioeconomic Pathway
stratospherelayer of the atmosphere above the troposphere that extends up to around 50 km altitude, and that includes the ozone layer
TEAPTechnology and Economic Assessment Panel of the Montreal Protocol
TFAtrifluoroacetic acid, a decomposition product of HFCs, HCFCs, and HFOs
tropospherelower layer of the atmosphere that extends from the surface to about 10-15 km (6-9 miles) altitude
UNEPUnited Nations Environment Programme
UNFCCCUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
UVultraviolet radiation
UV-Aultraviolet radiation between wavelengths of 315 and 400 nm
UV-Bultraviolet radiation between wavelengths of 280 and 315 nm
UV-Cultraviolet radiation between wavelengths of 100 and 280 nm
UVIultraviolet radiation index
VSLvery short-lived
WMOWorld Meteorological Organization
Chlorine Compounds
Clatomic chlorine
ClOchlorine monoxide
(ClO)2chlorine monoxide dimer, chemical structure ClOOCl
ClONO2chlorine nitrate
HClhydrogen chloride
CCl4carbon tetrachloride
CH3CCl3methyl chloroform
CH3Clmethyl chloride
Bromine Compounds
Bratomic bromine
BrObromine monoxide
BrClbromine monochloride
CH3Brmethyl bromide
Other Halogens
CF4carbon tetrafluoride
C2HF3O2trifluoroacetic acid
IOiodine monoxide
SF6sulfur hexafluoride
Other gases
COcarbon monoxide
CO2carbon dioxide
Hatomic hydrogen
H2Owater vapor
HNO3nitric acid
H2SO4sulfuric acid
N2molecular nitrogen
N2Onitrous oxide
NOxnitrogen oxides
Oatomic oxygen
O2molecular oxygen

List of Authors, Contributors, and Reviewers

Assessment Co-chairs
David W. Fahey, NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, USA
Paul A. Newman, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA
John A. Pyle, University of Cambridge and the National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS), UK
Bonfils Safari, University of Rwanda, College of Science and Technology, Rwanda
Lead Author
Ross J. Salawitch, University of Maryland, College Park, USA
Laura A. McBride, Albright College, USA
Chelsea R. Thompson, NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, USA
Eric L. Fleming, Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA
Richard L. McKenzie, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), New Zealand
Karen H. Rosenlof, NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, USA
Sarah J. Doherty, University of Colorado, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences at NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, USA
David W. Fahey, NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, USA
Contributing Authors
Simon Alexander, Australian Antarctic Division, Australia
Germar Bernhard, Biospherical Instruments, Inc., USA
Lucy Carpenter, University of York, UK
Gabriel Chiodo, ETH Zuürich, Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, Switzerland
Robert Damadeo, NASA Langley Research Center, USA
John S. Daniel, NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, USA
Sean Davis, NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, USA
Vitali Fioletov, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Canada
Hella Garny, Deutsches Zentrum fuür Luft und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut fuür Physik der Atmosphäre (IPA), Germany
Brad Hall, NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, USA
Birgit Hassler, Deutsches Zentrum fuür Luft und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut fuür Physik der Atmosphäre (IPA), Germany
James Haywood, University of Exeter and Met Office Hadley Centre, UK
Lei Hu, University of Colorado, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) at NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, USA
Yue Jia, University of Colorado, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) at NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, USA
Bryan Johnson, NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, USA
James Keeble, University of Cambridge, Department of Chemistry, UK
Johannes C. Laube, Forschungszentrum Juülich, Institute for Energy and Climate Research: Stratosphere (IEK-7), Germany
Eric Nash, Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA
Stefan Reimann, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa), Switzerland
Matt Rigby, University of Bristol, School of Chemistry, UK
Michelle L. Santee, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, USA
Susan Tegtmeier, University of Saskatchewan, Institute of Space and Atmospheric Studies, Canada
Simon Tilmes, National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Atmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling, USA
Walter Tribett, University of Maryland, College Park, USA
Guus J. M. Velders, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) & Utrecht University, Netherlands
Peter von der Gathen, Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Germany
Krzysztof Wargan, Science Systems and Applications Inc. (SSAI) at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA
Mark Weber, Universität Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics, Germany
Paul Young, Lancaster University, UK