2011 News & Events

Increase in particles high in Earth's atmosphere has offset some recent climate warming

21 July 2011

lidar instrument beam of light
Light from a lidar instrument forms a beam in the sky over Boulder, Colorado. NOAA researchers and colleagues used lidar data to better understand recent changes in the amounts of tiny particles high in Earth's atmosphere. Photo: David Oonk, NOAA / CIRES

A recent increase in the abundance of particles high in the atmosphere has offset about a third of the current climate warming influence of carbon dioxide (CO2) change during the past decade, according to a new study led by NOAA and published today in the online edition of Science.

In the stratosphere, miles above Earth's surface, small, airborne particles reflect sunlight back into space, which leads to a cooling influence at the ground. These particles are also called "aerosols," and the new paper explores their recent climate effects – the reasons behind their increase remain the subject of ongoing research.

"Since the year 2000, stratospheric aerosols have caused a slower rate of climate warming than we would have seen without them, says John Daniel, a physicist at CSD and an author of the new study.

The new study focused on the most recent decade, when the amount of aerosol in the stratosphere has been in something of a "background" state, lacking sharp upward spikes from very large volcanic eruptions. The authors analyzed measurements from several independent sources – satellites and several types of ground instruments – and found a definitive increase in stratospheric aerosol since 2000.

"Stratospheric aerosol increased surprisingly rapidly in that time, almost doubling during the decade," Daniel said. "The increase in aerosols since 2000 implies a cooling effect of about 0.1 watts per square meter – enough to offset some of the 0.28 watts per square meter warming effect from the carbon dioxide increase during that same period."

The reasons for the 10-year increase in stratospheric aerosols are not fully understood and are the subject of ongoing research, says coauthor Ryan Neely, with the University of Colorado and the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES). Likely suspects are natural sources - smaller volcanic eruptions - and/or human activities, which could have emitted the sulfur-containing gases, such as sulfur dioxide, that react in the atmosphere to form reflective aerosol particles.

Daniel and colleagues with NOAA, CIRES, the University of Colorado, NASA, and the University of Paris used a climate model to explore how changes in the stratosphere's aerosol content could affect global climate change - both in the last decade, and projected into the future. The team concluded that models miss an important cooling factor if they don't account for the influence of stratospheric aerosol, or don't include recent changes in stratospheric aerosol levels.

schematic showing sources of stratospheric aerosols
Sources of aerosols reach the stratosphere from above and below. Sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbonyl sulfide (OCS), and dimethyl sulfide (DMS) are the dominant surface emissions which contribute to aerosol formation. Schematic: Ryan Neely, NOAA

Moreover, future global temperatures will depend on stratospheric aerosol. The warming from greenhouse gases and aerosols calculated for the coming decade can vary by almost a factor of two – depending on whether aerosols continue to increase at the same rate as over the past decade, or if instead they decrease to very low levels, such as those experienced in 1960.

If stratospheric aerosol levels continue to increase, temperatures will not rise as quickly as they would otherwise, said Ellsworth Dutton, also with NOAA ESRL and a co-author on the paper. Conversely, if stratospheric aerosol levels decrease, temperatures would increase faster. Dutton and his colleagues use the term "persistently variable" to describe how the background levels of aerosol in Earth's stratosphere can change from one decade to the next, even in the absence of major volcanic activity.

Ultimately, by incorporating the ups and downs of stratospheric aerosols, climate models will be able to give not only better estimates of future climate change, but also better explanations of past climate changes.

"The 'background' stratospheric aerosols are more of a player than we thought," said Daniel. "The last decade has shown us that it doesn't take an extremely large volcanic eruption for these aerosols to be important to climate."

Susan Solomon1,2, John Daniel1, Ryan Neely1,2,5, J.P. Vernier3,4, Ellsworth Dutton5, and Larry Thomason3, The persistently variable "background" stratospheric Aarosol layer and global climate change, Science, doi:10.1126/science.1206027, 2011.

  1. Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA, Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
  2. Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
  3. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA
  4. LATMOS, CNRS-INSU, Université de Versailles St Quentin, Université de Paris, France
  5. Global Monitoring Division, NOAA, Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
Abstract

Recent measurements demonstrate that the "background" stratospheric aerosol layer is persistently variable rather than constant, even in the absence of major volcanic eruptions. Several independent data sets show that stratospheric aerosols increased in abundance since 2000. Near-global satellite aerosol data imply a negative radiative forcing due to stratospheric aerosol changes over this period of about -0.1 W/m2, reducing the recent global warming that would otherwise have occurred. Observations from earlier periods are limited but suggest an additional negative radiative forcing of about -0.1 W/m2 from 1960 to 1990. Climate model projections neglecting these changes would continue to overestimate the radiative forcing and global warming in coming decades if these aerosols remain present at current values or increase.